Cross-shift study of exposure-response relationships between bioaerosol exposure and respiratory effects in the Norwegian grain and animal feed production industry.
We have studied cross-shift respiratory responses of several individual bioaerosol components of the dust in the grain and feed industry in Norway.
Cross-shift changes in lung function and nasal congestion, as well as in respiratory and systemic symptoms of 56 exposed workers and 36 referents, were recorded on the same day as full-shift exposure to the inhalable aerosol fraction was assessed. Exposure-response associations were investigated by regression analysis.
The workers were exposed on average to 1.0 mg/m(3) of grain dust, 440 EU/m(3) of endotoxin, 6 ?g/m(3) of ?-1,3-glucans, 17?10(4)/m(3) of bacteria and 4?10(4)/m(3) of fungal spores during work. The exposure was associated with higher prevalence of self-reported eye and airway symptoms, which were related to the individual microbial components in a complex manner. Fatigue and nose symptoms were strongest associated with fungal spores, cough with or without phlegm was associated with grain dust and fungal spores equally strong and wheeze/tight chest/dyspnoea was strongest associated with grain dust. Bioaerosol exposure did not lead to cross-shift lung function decline, but several microbial components had influence on nose congestion.
Exposure to fungal spores and dust showed stronger associations with respiratory symptoms and fatigue than endotoxin exposure. The associations with dust suggest that there are other components in dust than the ones studied that induce these effects.
Notes
Cites: J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Dec;50(12):1394-40019092495
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60(6):444-5012771397
Cites: Br J Ind Med. 1984 Feb;41(1):94-96691942
Cites: Eur Respir J. 2001 Nov;18(5):770-911757626
Cites: Chest. 1996 Jul;110(1):263-708681637
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jul;54(7):457-659282120
Cites: Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Aug;56(7):776-8822553153
Cites: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Aug;28(4):256-6312199427
Cites: Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Nov;57(9):1105-1423813889
Cites: Environ Health Perspect. 1986 Apr;66:73-803709486
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Nov 15;136(10):1269-791476149
Cites: Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001 Jun;16(6):685-9711414519
Cites: Eur Respir J. 2005 Oct;26(4):720-3516204605
Cites: Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Dec;144(6):1314-211741544
Cites: Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 Jul;59(6):724-3625743566
Cites: Chest. 2004 Apr;125(4):1394-915078751
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1998 May;55(5):349-559764113
Cites: Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):319-3816055882
Cites: J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Sep;57(9):1004-826340289
Cites: Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Sep;128(3):399-4046614633