Kozlowski and Page have criticized a study published in 1982 in CMAJ on the effects of supportive follow-up on the rate at which patients quit smoking cigarettes. We agree with some of their general sentiments about the need for establishing a consensus on the evaluation of smoking cessation programs. More specifically, we defend the particular analysis originally used, given the state of knowledge and constraints on the study. We examine their main objections: the definition of successful cessation, the design of the study, the exclusion of patients lost to follow-up, the methods of statistical analysis used and the strength of more recent evidence on the usefulness of follow-up visits. We believe that the role of supportive follow-up deserves further evaluation.
Notes
Cites: Br Med J. 1979 Jul 28;2(6184):231-5476401
Cites: Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Jan 15;126(2):127-97037143
Cites: Addict Behav. 1982;7(3):299-3027180625
Cites: Prev Med. 1984 Sep;13(5):517-276396639
Cites: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 May 11;290(6479):1397-83922510
Cites: NIDA Res Monogr. 1983;48:74-896443147
Cites: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 22;292(6523):803-63082450