Lung asbestos burden was compared with exposure indices derived from job history interviews in 42 male subjects originating from the Montréal Case-Control Study project, 12 of whom had documented asbestos exposed job histories. Job interview data consisting of a chronological timetable of job histories were translated into detailed exposure indices by an expert group of hygienists and chemists. Total and individual asbestos fibre type concentrations were quantified by transmission electron microscopy with fibre identification by energy dispersive chi ray spectrometry after deparaffinisation of tissue blocks and low temperature plasma ashing. Geometric mean or median asbestos content was higher in subjects with an asbestos exposed job history than those without for retained dose of amosite, total commercial amphiboles, and total asbestos fibre. Except for crocidolite fibre diameter, which was significantly less in the lungs of exposed workers, no consistent differences were found in measurements of fibre dimension for any fibre type. Subgroups of subjects exposed to silica, metals, or smokers and non-smokers without significant occupational exposure showed varying patterns of lung asbestos fibre type deficit compared with the asbestos exposed subgroup. There was an overall trend for higher lung asbestos content proportional to higher exposure indices for asbestos representing concentration, frequency, and reliability. These exposure indices as well as duration of exposure (in years) were independent predictors of total asbestos content in regression analyses when combined in a model with age. Stepwise regression indicated that exposure concentration was the most important variable, explaining 32% of the total variation in total asbestos content. Smoking, whether expressed in ever or never smoked dichotomy or in smoked-years, had no relation to lung asbestos content in this model.
Notes
Cites: J Occup Med. 1985 Jun;27(6):420-64020500
Cites: Environ Res. 1983 Aug;31(2):374-806884297
Cites: Br J Ind Med. 1986 Jan;43(1):18-283947558
Cites: Br J Ind Med. 1986 Oct;43(10):667-763778837
Cites: Arch Environ Health. 1987 Jul-Aug;42(4):185-912821933
Cites: Scand J Work Environ Health. 1987 Dec;13(6):486-923433050
Cites: Arch Environ Health. 1988 Mar-Apr;43(2):83-93377561
Cites: Cancer. 1989 Apr 15;63(8):1544-72924262
Cites: Br J Ind Med. 1989 Mar;46(3):180-72539184
Cites: Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Dec;142(6 Pt 1):1453-82252267
Cites: Ann Occup Hyg. 1990 Oct;34(5):427-412281888
Cites: Br J Ind Med. 1991 Jan;48(1):48-521993160
Cites: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991 Dec 31;643:61-701809175
Cites: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981 Feb;66(2):217-256935472
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Feb;123(2):235-493946373