In canada, health care is publicly insured and available to all at no charge. Recently, financial pressures have threatened the system and led to considerable debate about how to save it. One proposal is to permit privately funded health care alongside the public system, resulting in what is popularly called a two-tiered system. This paper presents some of the arguments for and against two-tiered health care. Using as an example cataract surgery-a procedure that is available both publicly and privately-the authors look at some common beliefs about private health care in Canada. They conclude that the growth in private sector cataract surgery does not appear to be related to cutbacks or rationing, that private access does not necessarily shorten waiting times, and that, contrary to popular belief, it is not only the well-to-do who pay for private surgery in Canada.
Notes
Cites: Health Serv Res. 1985 Aug;20(3):341-584019215
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1988 Jul;78(7):777-823381951
Cites: Med Care. 1989 May;27(5):441-522786119
Cites: Med Care. 1989 May;27(5):507-212725083
Cites: Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(5):545-502218636
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Oct;72(9):1286-932229102
Cites: Int J Health Serv. 1991;21(2):265-832071306
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1992 May;82(5):703-101566949
Cites: JAMA. 1993 Apr 7;269(13):1661-68455299
Cites: Health Rep. 1993;5(2):157-778292756
Cites: Med Care. 1995 Feb;33(2):127-387837821
Cites: CMAJ. 1995 Sep 15;153(6):801-37664232
Comment In: Public Health Rep. 1997 Nov-Dec;112(6):445-610822469