The request for scientifically appropriate terminology in research on race, ethnicity, and health has largely bypassed the term White. This and other words, such as Caucasian, are embedded in clinical and epidemiological discourse, yet they are rarely defined. This commentary analyzes the issue from the perspective of the epidemiology of the health of minority ethnic and racial groups in Europe and the United States. Minority groups are usually compared with populations described as White, Caucasian, European, Europid, Western, Occidental, indigenous, native, and majority. Such populations are heterogeneous, the labels nonspecific, and the comparisons misleading. Terminology that reflects the research purpose-for examples, reference, control, or comparison--is better (unlike White, these terms imply no norm, allowing neither writers nor readers to make stereotyped assumptions about the comparison populations. This paper widens the debate on nomenclature for racial and ethnic groups. Many issues need exploration, including whether there is a shared understanding among the international research community of the terms discussed.
Notes
Cites: J Public Health Med. 1991 Nov;13(4):244-61764280
Cites: Ethn Health. 1996 Mar;1(1):95-89395552
Cites: Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):26-418303011
Cites: Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):4-68303012
Cites: Health Serv Res. 1994 Aug;29(3):261-748063565
Cites: BMJ. 1994 Jul 30;309(6950):327-308086873
Cites: J Public Health Med. 1992 Jun;14(2):104-101515192
Cites: BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1751-69202509
Cites: BMJ. 1997 Mar 8;314(7082):705-109116545
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1996 Oct 15;125(8):675-98849153
Cites: BMJ. 1996 Apr 27;312(7038):10548616399
Cites: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Mar 3;288(6418):696-86421437
Cites: Am Heart J. 1984 Sep;108(3 Pt 2):715-226382997
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1987 Jan;77(1):61-83789240
Cites: Int J Health Serv. 1989;19(3):557-712753584