This study was designed to describe the distribution of risk factors for cardiovascular disease by socioeconomic status in adult men and women across Canada using the Canadian Heart Health Surveys Database.
The data were derived from provincial cross-sectional surveys done between 1986 and 1992. Data were obtained through a home interview and a clinic visit using a probability sample of 29,855 men and women aged 18-74 years of whom 23,129 (77%) agreed to participate. The following risk factors for cardiovascular disease were considered: elevated total plasma cholesterol (greater than 5.2 mmol/L), regular current cigarette smoking (one or more daily), elevated diastolic or systolic blood pressure (140/90 mm Hg), overweight (body mass index and lack of leisure-time physical activity [less than once a week in the last month]). Education and income adequacy were used as measures of socioeconomic status and mother tongue as a measure of cultural affiliation.
For most of the risk factors examined, the prevalence of the risk factors was inversely related to socioeconomic status, but the relationship was stronger and more consistent for education than for income. The inverse relationship between socioeconomic status and the prevalence of the risk factors was particularly strong for smoking and overweight, where a gradient was observed: 46% (standard error [SE] 1.4) of men and 42% (SE 4.3) of women who had not completed secondary school were regular smokers, but only 12% (SE 1.0) of men and 13% (SE 0.9) of women with a university degree were regular smokers. Thirty-nine percent (SE 1.4) of men and 19% (SE 3.8) of women who had not completed secondary school were overweight, compared with 26% (SE 2.6) of male and 19% of female university graduates. The prevalence of leisure-time physical inactivity and elevated cholesterol was highest in both men and women in the lowest socioeconomic category, particularly by level of education.
The differences in the prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease between socioeconomic groups are still important in Canada and should be considered in planning programs to reduce the morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease.
Notes
Cites: JAMA. 1978 Aug 25;240(8):756-8671706
Cites: Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215847061
Cites: Public Health Rep. 1981 Nov-Dec;96(6):514-227302105
Cites: Health Educ Q. 1984 Spring;11(1):1-476392204
Cites: Public Health Rep. 1985 Jan-Feb;100(1):5-123918324
Cites: J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(8):671-824019704
Cites: CMAJ. 1986 Jan 15;134(2):127-323484656
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Feb;123(2):209-203946371
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Apr;123(4):623-403953541
Cites: Lancet. 1986 Aug 2;2(8501):274-62874291
Cites: Prev Med. 1986 Sep;15(5):475-913774779
Cites: Annu Rev Public Health. 1987;8:111-353555518
Cites: Lancet. 1987 Jul 25;2(8552):197-2012885648
Cites: JAMA. 1987 Dec 25;258(24):3527-313682156
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1988 May;127(5):923-323258732
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Jun;127(6):1131-423369413
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 1988 May-Jun;4(3):121-73395497
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 1988 Nov-Dec;4(6):349-523228532
Cites: Int J Epidemiol. 1989;18(3 Suppl 1):S20-82807703
Cites: Int J Epidemiol. 1989;18(3 Suppl 1):S58-662807708
Cites: Community Health Stud. 1989;13(3):289-932605901
Cites: Prev Med. 1990 Jan;19(1):1-122320553
Cites: Am J Health Promot. 1990 Jan-Feb;4(3):203-1310106540
Cites: Int J Health Serv. 1990;20(3):405-162384285
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 1990 May-Jun;6(3):137-442397137
Cites: Can J Public Health. 1990 Sep-Oct;81(5):376-812253155