Clinicians are exposed to numerous hypertension guidelines. However, their enthusiasm for these guidelines, and the impact of the guidelines, appears modest at best. Barriers to the successful implementation of a guideline can be identified at the level of the clinician, the patient or the practice setting; however, the shortcomings of the guidelines themselves have received little attention. In this paper, we review the hypertension guidelines that are most commonly encountered by Canadian clinicians: the "1999 Canadian Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension," "The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure" in the United States and the "1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension." The key points of these guidelines are compared and the shortcomings that may impede their ability to influence practice are discussed. The main implications for future guideline developers are outlined.
Notes
Cites: JAMA. 1999 May 26;281(20):1900-510349893
Cites: J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Apr;14(4):236-4210203636
Cites: CMAJ. 1999 Sep 21;161(6):699-70410513276
Cites: CMAJ. 1999 May 18;160(10):1449-5510352634
Cites: JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-6510535437
Cites: CMAJ. 1999;161 Suppl 12:S1-1710624417
Cites: Lancet. 2000 Jan 8;355(9198):103-610675167
Cites: Can Fam Physician. 2000 Jul;46:1413-6, 1418-2110925753
Cites: CMAJ. 2000 Aug 22;163(4):403-810976255
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2000 Sep;16(9):1094-10211021953
Cites: Acta Med Scand. 1984;216(3):251-96496184
Cites: Lancet. 1990 Mar 31;335(8692):765-741969518
Cites: Lancet. 1990 Apr 7;335(8693):827-381969567
Cites: CMAJ. 1992 Jun 1;146(11):2021-91596851
Cites: J Hypertens. 1993 Sep;11(9):899-9038254172
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 1;120(11):966-88172442
Cites: Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55-6410142039