To describe the small area system developed in Finland. To illustrate the use of the system with analyses of incidence of lung cancer around an asbestos mine. To compare the performance of different spatial statistical models when applied to sparse data.
In the small area system, cancer and population data are available by sex, age, and socioeconomic status in adjacent "pixels", squares of size 0.5 km x 0.5 km. The study area was partitioned into sub-areas based on estimated exposure. The original data at the pixel level were used in a spatial random field model. For comparison, standardised incidence ratios were estimated, and full bayesian and empirical bayesian models were fitted to aggregated data. Incidence of lung cancer around a former asbestos mine was used as an illustration.
The spatial random field model, which has been used in former small area studies, did not converge with present fine resolution data. The number of neighbouring pixels used in smoothing had to be enlarged, and informative distributions for hyperparameters were used to stabilise the unobserved random field. The ordered spatial random field model gave lower estimates than the Poisson model. When one of the three effects of area were fixed, the model gave similar estimates with a narrower interval than the Poisson model.
The use of fine resolution data and socioeconomic status as a means of controlling for confounding related to lifestyle is useful when estimating risk of cancer around point sources. However, better statistical methods are needed for spatial modelling of fine resolution data.
Notes
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1999 Nov;56(11):774-8010658564
Cites: J Public Health Med. 1999 Sep;21(3):289-9810528956
Cites: Biometrics. 1987 Sep;43(3):671-813663823
Cites: Cancer Causes Control. 1992 May;3(3):255-631610972
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1993 Feb;83(2):233-98427329
Cites: BMJ. 1993 Oct 9;307(6909):895-98241851
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1994 Jun;51(6):421-58044235
Cites: Stat Methods Med Res. 1995 Jun;4(2):137-597582202
Cites: Stat Med. 1995 Nov 15-30;14(21-22):2459-728711281
Cites: BMJ. 1996 Oct 26;313(7064):1047-518898595
Cites: Environ Res. 1995 Nov;71(2):128-348977621
Cites: Environ Res. 1997 Feb;72(2):118-309177654
Cites: Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;27(1):74-829563697
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1999 May;56(5):308-1410472304
Cites: Stat Med. 2000 Sep 15-30;19(17-18):2217-4110960849