To determine if the delivery of hospital discharge summaries to follow-up physicians decreases the risk of hospital readmission.
Eight hundred eighty-eight patients discharged from a single hospital following treatment for an acute medical illness.
Teaching hospital in a universal health-care system.
We determined the date that each patient's discharge summary was printed and the physicians to whom it was sent. Summary receipt was confirmed by survey and phoning each physician's office. Each patient's hospital chart was reviewed to determine their acute and chronic medical conditions as well as their course in hospital. Using population-based administrative databases, all post-hospitalization visits were identified. For each of these visits, we determined whether the summary was available.
Time to nonelective hospital readmission during 3 months following discharge.
The discharge summary was available for only 568 of 4,639 outpatient visits (12.2%). Overall, 240 (27.0%) of patients were urgently readmitted to hospital. After adjusting for significant patient and hospitalization factors, we found a trend toward a decreased risk of readmission for patients who were seen in follow-up by a physician who had received a summary (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 1.11).
The risk of rehospitalization may decrease when patients are assessed following discharge by physicians who have received the discharge summary. Further research is required to determine if better continuity of patient information improves patient outcomes.
Notes
Cites: J Gen Intern Med. 1991 May-Jun;6(3):223-82066826
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 16;130(4 Pt 2):338-4210068402
Cites: J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(5):389-931744751
Cites: Health Serv Res. 1992 Apr;27(1):81-1011563955
Cites: Inquiry. 1993 Spring;30(1):95-1038454320
Cites: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Aug;41(8):811-78340558
Cites: Inquiry. 1994 Summer;31(2):163-728021022
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 8;154(15):1721-98042889
Cites: Aust Fam Physician. 1994 Jul;23(7):1320-1, 1324-5, 13288060277
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 15;122(6):415-217856989
Cites: CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-337728691
Cites: CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1437-427728692
Cites: Arch Fam Med. 1995 May;4(5):403-97742962
Cites: Br J Surg. 1996 Jun;83(6):788-908696741
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 16;130(4 Pt 2):343-910068403
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 16;130(4 Pt 2):368-7210068408
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 16;130(4 Pt 2):373-510068409
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 16;130(4 Pt 2):376-8110068410
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 16;130(4 Pt 1):326-710068394
Cites: CMAJ. 1999 Feb 9;160(3):319-2610065073
Cites: CMAJ. 1999 Feb 9;160(3):345-610065076
Cites: Am Heart J. 1999 May;137(5):919-2710220642
Cites: Med Care. 1999 May;37(5):490-50110335751
Cites: J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Nov;11(11):684-89120655