Epidemiological studies of exposures that vary with time require an additional level of methodological complexity to account for the time-dependence of exposure. This study compares a nested case-control approach for the study of time-dependent exposure with cohort analysis using Cox regression including time-dependent covariates.
A cohort of 1340 subjects with four fixed and seven time-dependent covariates was used for this study. Nested case-control analyses were repeated 100 times for each of 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 controls per case, and point estimates were compared to those obtained using Cox regression on the full cohort. Computational efficiencies were evaluated by comparing central processing unit times required for analysis of the cohort at sizes 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 times its initial size.
Nested case-control analyses yielded results that were similar to results of Cox regression on the full cohort. Cox regression was found to be 125 times slower than the nested case-control approach (using four controls per case).
The nested case-control approach is a useful alternative for cohort analysis when studying time-dependent exposures. Its superior computational efficiency may be particularly useful when studying rare outcomes in databases, where the ability to analyze larger sample sizes can improve the power of the study.
Notes
Cites: Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;27(5):772-809839732
Cites: Epidemiol Rev. 1998;20(1):43-569762508
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jan;56(1):67-910341749
Cites: Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:145-5710352854
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Dec 1;150(11):1188-20010588079
Cites: Ann Epidemiol. 2000 May;10(4):200-410854954
Cites: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jan 15;41(2):249-5412535818
Cites: Am Heart J. 2003 Oct;146(4):581-9014564310
Cites: Biometrics. 1973 Sep;29(3):479-864793136
Cites: Biometrics. 1975 Sep;31(3):643-91100136
Cites: J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(5):379-883700579
Cites: Am J Med Sci. 1994 Jul;308(1):58-628010340
Cites: Med Care. 1994 Jul;32(7 Suppl):JS38-518028412