Patterns of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) strongly depend on the availability of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities. Although the management found at hospitals without on-site catheterization does not lead to increased mortality, little it known about its impact on resource utilization and non-fatal outcomes.
We identified all patients (n = 35,289) admitted with a first AMI in the province of Quebec between January 1, 1996 and March 31, 1999 using population-based administrative databases. Medical resource utilization and non-fatal and fatal outcomes were compared among patients admitted to hospitals with and without on-site cardiac catheterization facilities.
Cardiac catheterization and PCI were more frequently performed among patients admitted to hospitals with catheterization facilities. However, non-invasive procedures were not used more frequently at hospitals without catheterization facilities. To the contrary, echocardiography [odds ratio (OR), 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.93-2.16] and multi-gated acquisition imaging (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17-1.32) were used more frequently at hospitals with catheterization, and exercise treadmill testing (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.91-1.15) and Sestamibi/Thallium imaging (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98) were used similarly at hospitals with and without catheterization. Use of anti-ischemic medications and frequency of emergency room and physician visits, were similar at both types of institutions. Readmission rates for AMI-related cardiac complications and mortality were also similar [adjusted hazard ratio, recurrent AMI: 1.02, 95% CI, 0.89-1.16; congestive heart failure: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.90-1.15; unstable angina: 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.02; mortality: 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05)].
Although on-site availability of cardiac catheterization facilities is associated with greater use of invasive cardiac procedures, non-availability of catheterization did not translate into a higher use of non-invasive tests or have an impact on the fatal and non-fatal outcomes available for study in our administrative database.
Notes
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 1999 Nov;15(11):1277-8210579743
Cites: Circulation. 1998 Nov 10;98(19):2010-69808598
Cites: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Feb;35(2):371-910676683
Cites: Lancet. 2000 Jul 1;356(9223):9-1610892758
Cites: CMAJ. 2000 Jul 11;163(1):31-610920727
Cites: JAMA. 2001 Apr 25;285(16):2101-811311099
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 21;344(25):1879-8711419424
Cites: Lancet. 1988 Jan 30;1(8579):197-2032893037
Cites: Circulation. 1990 May;81(5):1457-762110033
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1990 Sep 1;66(5):538-452118299
Cites: BMJ. 1991 Mar 9;302(6776):555-602021717
Cites: Circulation. 1992 Feb;85(2):533-421735149
Cites: JAMA. 1992 Nov 11;268(18):2530-61404820
Cites: N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 19;329(8):546-518336755