To describe the provision of safety training to Canadian employees, specifically those in their first year of employment with a new employer.
Three repeated national Canadian cross-sectional surveys.
59 159 respondents from Statistics Canada's Workplace and Employee Surveys (1999, 2001 and 2003), 5671 who were in their first year of employment.
Receiving occupational health and safety training, orientation training or office or non-office equipment training in either a classroom or on-the-job in the previous 12 months.
Only 12% of women and 16% of men reported receiving safety training in the previous 12 months. Employees in their first 12 months of employment were more likely to receive safety training than employees with >5 years of job tenure. However, still only one in five new employees had received any safety training while with their current employer. In a fully adjusted regression model, employees who had access to family and support programs, women in medium-sized workplaces and in manufacturing, and men in large workplaces and in part-time employment all had an increased probability of receiving safety training. No increased likelihood of safety training was found in younger workers or those in jobs with higher physical demands, both of which are associated with increased injury risk.
From our results, it would appear that only one in five Canadian employees in their first year of a new job received safety training. Further, the provision of safety training does not appear to be more prevalent among workers or in occupations with increased risk of injuries.
Notes
Cites: Int J Law Psychiatry. 1999 Sep-Dec;22(5-6):581-60110637759
Cites: Am J Ind Med. 2003 Jun;43(6):618-2912768612
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2003 Sep;60(9):E1012937206
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2004 Sep;61(9):750-615317915
Cites: Am J Public Health. 2006 Feb;96(2):315-2416380566
Cites: Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1991 Apr;52(4):A211-22069117
Cites: Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Jun;80(3 Pt 1):931-407567414
Cites: Am J Ind Med. 2005 Jul;48(1):50-615940721
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2006 Jan;63(1):27-3216361402