Several jurisdictions attempting to reform primary care have focused on changes in physician remuneration. The goals of this study were to compare the delivery of preventive services by practices in four primary care funding models and to identify organizational factors associated with superior preventive care.
In a cross-sectional study, we included 137 primary care practices in the province of Ontario (35 fee-for-service practices, 35 with salaried physicians [community health centres], 35 practices in the new capitation model [family health networks] and 32 practices in the established capitation model [health services organizations]). We surveyed 288 family physicians. We reviewed 4108 randomly selected patient charts and assigned prevention scores based on the proportion of eligible preventive manoeuvres delivered for each patient.
A total of 3284 patients were eligible for at least one of six preventive manoeuvres. After adjusting for patient profile and contextual factors, we found that, compared with prevention scores in practices in the new capitation model, scores were significantly lower in fee-for-service practices (ß estimate for effect on prevention score = -6.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] -11.9 to -0.6) and practices in the established capitation model (ß = -9.1, 95% CI -14.9 to -3.3) but not for those with salaried remuneration (ß = -0.8, 95% CI -6.5 to 4.8). After accounting for physician characteristics and organizational structure, the type of funding model was no longer a statistically significant factor. Compared with reference practices, those with at least one female family physician (ß = 8.0, 95% CI 4.2 to 11.8), a panel size of fewer than 1600 patients per full-time equivalent family physician (ß = 6.8, 95% CI 3.1 to 10.6) and an electronic reminder system (ß = 4.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 8.7) had superior prevention scores. The effect of these three factors was largely but not always consistent across the funding models; it was largely consistent across the preventive manoeuvres.
No funding model was clearly associated with superior preventive care. Factors related to physician characteristics and practice structure were stronger predictors of performance. Practices with one or more female physicians, a smaller patient load and an electronic reminder system had superior prevention scores. Our findings raise questions about reform initiatives aimed at increasing patient numbers, but they support the adoption of information technology.
Notes
Cites: J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 Mar;10(2):201-811268303
Cites: Fam Pract. 2008 Feb;25(1):40-818209107
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 2002 May 7;136(9):641-5111992299
Cites: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 Jan-Feb;12(1):73-8012639371
Cites: Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36(1):22-714710325
Cites: Fam Pract. 2004 Feb;21(1):11-714760037
Cites: Cancer. 2004 May 1;100(9):1843-5215112264
Cites: J Ambul Care Manage. 2005 Jan-Mar;28(1):86-9715682966
Cites: Prev Med. 2005 May;40(5):595-60115749144
Cites: Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):486-9215838414
Cites: Med J Aust. 2005 Jul 18;183(2):104-516022627
Cites: Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):939-4416116360
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;3(5):430-516189059
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 2006 May;30(5):413-2216627129
Cites: Healthc Q. 2006;9(3):34-4216826765
Cites: Fam Pract. 2006 Aug;23(4):469-7116595539
Cites: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:5717166270
Cites: J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Aug;22(8):1195-20517534688
Cites: Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1727-3517437502