Evaluation of quality improvement programmes.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature187346
Source
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):270-5
Publication Type
Article
Date
Sep-2002
Author
J. Øvretveit
D. Gustafson
Author Affiliation
Nordic School of Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Sweden. jovret@aol.com
Source
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):270-5
Date
Sep-2002
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Evidence-Based Medicine
Health Services Research - methods
Hospital Administration - methods - standards
Humans
Management Audit
Program Evaluation - methods
Research Design - standards
Sweden
Total Quality Management
Abstract
In response to increasing concerns about quality, many countries are carrying out large scale programmes which include national quality strategies, hospital programmes, and quality accreditation, assessment and review processes. Increasing amounts of resources are being devoted to these interventions, but do they ensure or improve quality of care? There is little research evidence as to their effectiveness or the conditions for maximum effectiveness. Reasons for the lack of evaluation research include the methodological challenges of measuring outcomes and attributing causality to these complex, changing, long term social interventions to organisations or health systems, which themselves are complex and changing. However, methods are available which can be used to evaluate these programmes and which can provide decision makers with research based guidance on how to plan and implement them. This paper describes the research challenges, the methods which can be used, and gives examples and guidance for future research. It emphasises the important contribution which such research can make to improving the effectiveness of these programmes and to developing the science of quality improvement.
Notes
Cites: Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):625-48, 5119879305
Cites: Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):593-624, 5109879304
Cites: Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):203-910894191
Cites: Qual Health Care. 2001 Mar;10(1):40-811239143
Cites: BMJ. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):851-411290644
Cites: Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2000;13(4-5):200-711486674
Cites: J Manag Med. 2001;15(2):125-4111547821
Cites: BMJ. 2001 Sep 29;323(7315):746-911576986
Cites: Int J Health Plann Manage. 2001 Jul-Sep;16(3):229-4111596559
Cites: Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Oct;13(5):367-7411669564
Cites: Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1994 Apr;6(3):14-710133644
Cites: Qual Manag Health Care. 1994 Summer;2(4):63-7210137609
Cites: Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;6(2):115-327953212
Cites: Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Aug;20(8):425-428000481
Cites: Health Serv Res. 1995 Jun;30(2):377-4017782222
Cites: Health Care Manage Rev. 1995 Spring;20(2):16-337607882
Cites: Health Care Manage Rev. 1995 Fall;20(4):15-25; discussion 28-9, 30-338543468
Cites: Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1996 Summer;41(2):143-5910157960
Cites: Health Care Manage Rev. 1996 Winter;21(1):48-608647690
Cites: Health Care Manage Rev. 1996 Winter;21(1):73-828647694
Cites: Qual Health Care. 1997 Mar;6(1):49-5510166603
Cites: Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):169-7510894187
PubMed ID
12486994 View in PubMed
Less detail