Are self-report of disability pension and long-term sickness absence accurate? Comparisons of self-reported interview data with national register data in a Swedish twin cohort.
BMC Public Health. 2010;10:763
Publication Type
Pia Svedberg
Annina Ropponen
Paul Lichtenstein
Kristina Alexanderson
Author Affiliation
Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2010;10:763
Publication Type
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disabled Persons
Insurance, Disability
Interviews as Topic
Middle Aged
Pensions - statistics & numerical data
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and specificity
Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data
Universal Coverage
Self-reported disability pension (DP) and sickness absence are commonly used in epidemiological and other studies as a measure of exposure or even as an outcome. The aims were (1) to compare such self-reports with national register information in order to evaluate the validity of self-reported DP and sickness absence, and (2) to estimate the concordance of reporting behaviour in different twin zygosity groups, also by sex.
All Swedish twins born 1933-1958 who participated in the Screening Across the Lifespan Twin study (SALT) 1998-2003, were included (31,122 individuals). The self-reported DP and long-term sickness absence (LTSA) at the time of interview was compared to the corresponding register information retrieved from the National Social Insurance Agency by calculating the proportions of agreements, kappa, sensitivity, specificity, concordance rates, and chi-square test, to evaluate construct validity.
The proportions of overall agreement were 96% and specificity 99% for both DP and LTSA, while the sensitivity was 70% for DP and 45% for LTSA. Kappa estimates were 0.76 for DP, and 0.58 for LTSA. The proportions of positive agreement were 64% for DP and 42% for LTSA. No difference in response style was found between zygosity groups among complete twin pairs for DP and LTSA. Results were similar for women and men and across age. Kappa estimates for DP differed somewhat depending on years of education, 0.68 (college/university) vs. 0.77 (less than 13 years in school) but not for LTSA.
Self-reported DP data may be very useful in studies when register information is not available, however, register data is preferred especially for LTSA. The same degree of twin similarity was found for truthful self-report of DP and LTSA in both monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs. Thus, the response style was not influenced by genetic factors. One consequence of this would be that when estimating the relative importance of genetic and environmental effects from twin models, heritability estimates would not be biased.
Cites: Genet Epidemiol. 1999;16(3):290-30410096691
Cites: Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Oct 15;61(10):1343-5119790135
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2005 Feb;62(2):74-915657187
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2005 Feb;62(2):135-4015657199
Cites: Am J Ind Med. 2006 May;49(5):394-40116570253
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jan;65(1):61-717704196
Cites: J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jun;50(6):611-318545086
Cites: J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Jul;51(7):786-9619528832
Cites: Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(2):243-910832571
Cites: Thyroid. 2001 Aug;11(8):769-7311525270
Cites: Twin Res. 2002 Apr;5(2):98-10611931687
Cites: J Intern Med. 2002 Sep;252(3):184-20512270000
Cites: Occup Med (Lond). 2002 Dec;52(8):485-9012488520
Cites: Twin Res. 2002 Oct;5(5):427-3212537870
Cites: Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:3-26315513647
Cites: Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:44-815513653
Cites: Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:49-10815513654
Cites: Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74843571
Cites: Health Serv Manage Res. 1990 Nov;3(3):163-7210125073
Cites: Med Care. 1994 Apr;32(4):401-48139304
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1994 Nov;51(11):756-607849853
Cites: J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Apr;49(2):124-307798038
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1996 Jan;53(1):58-628563859
Cites: Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Oct;24(5):425-319869315
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;44(1):3-1815608539
PubMed ID
21159191 View in PubMed
Less detail