Health policy has strengthened the demand for coordination between clinicians and managers and introduced new medical manager roles in hospitals to better connect medicine and management. These developments have created a scholarly debate of concepts and an increasing 'hybridization' of tasks and roles, yet the organizational effects are not well researched. This research introduces a multi-level governance approach and aims to explore the organizational needs of doctors using Sweden as a case study.
We apply an assessment framework focusing on macro-meso levels and managerial-professional modes of hospital governance (using document analysis, secondary sources, and expert information) and expand the analysis towards the micro-level. Qualitative explorative empirical material gathered in two different studies in Swedish hospitals serves to pilot research into actor-centred perceptions of clinical management from the viewpoint of the 'managed' and the 'managing' doctors in an organization.
Sweden has developed a model of integrated hospital governance with complex structural coordination between medicine and management on the level of the organization. In terms of formal requirements, the professional background is less relevant for many management positions but in everyday work, medical managers are perceived primarily as colleagues and not as experts advising on managerial problems. The managers themselves seem to rely more on personal strength and medical knowledge than on management tools. Bringing doctors into management may hybridize formal roles and concepts, but it does not necessarily change the perceptions of doctors and improve managerial-professional coordination at the micro-level of the organization.
This study brings gaps in hospital governance into view that may create organizational weaknesses and unmet management needs, thereby constraining more coordinated and integrated medical management.
Notes
Cites: Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;65(7):722-421518159
Cites: BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 02;13:24623819578
Cites: Health Econ Policy Law. 2009 Jul;4(Pt 3):265-8119467167
Cites: BMC Med. 2009 Oct 26;7:6419857246
Cites: J Health Organ Manag. 2016 May 16;30(3):421-4027119395
Cites: Sociol Health Illn. 2009 Jul;31(5):642-5819392937
Cites: Soc Sci Med. 2012 Feb;74(3):332-921496984
Cites: BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 13;14:25124927743
Cites: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014 Feb 25;19(3):189-19124569982
Cites: BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Sep 17;10:27120849581
Cites: Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Nov 03;5(1):33-4226673647
Cites: J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(4-5):578-60423115906
Cites: Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;77:147-5523232025
Cites: Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1:56-6524615595
Cites: BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 22;12:42123173953
Cites: BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb 15;11:3621324128
Cites: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Apr;14(2):70-619299259
Cites: Scand J Public Health. 2010 Nov;38(7):673-721059879
Cites: Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(5):1-15922894859
Cites: J Health Polit Policy Law. 2012 Aug;37(4):611-3222466051
Cites: Sociol Health Illn. 2012 May;34(4):626-4421929618
Cites: BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 04;15:30526238863