Construction of a Job Exposure Matrix to Dust, Fluoride, and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Norwegian Aluminum Industry using Prediction Models.
The Norwegian aluminum industry developed and implemented a protocol for prospective monitoring of employees' exposure using personal samplers. We analyzed these data to develop prediction lines to construct a job exposure matrix (JEM) for the period 1986-1995.
The protocol for personal monitoring of exposure was implemented in all seven Norwegian aluminum plants in 1986 and continued until 1995. Personal samplers were used to collect total dust, fluorides, and total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). In addition, exposure could be categorized according to process, i.e. prebake, Søderberg, and 'other'. We constructed four-dimensional JEMs characterized by: Plant, Job descriptor, Process, and Year. Totally 8074, 6734, and 3524 measurements were available for dust, fluorides, and PAH, respectively. The data were analyzed using linear mixed models with two-way interactions. The models were assessed using the Akaike criterion (AIC) and unadjusted R (2). The significance level was set to 10% (two-sided) for retaining variables in the model.
In 1986, the geometric mean (95% confidence interval in parentheses) for total dust, total fluorides, and PAH were 3.18 (0.46-22.2) mg m(-3), 0.58 (0.085-4.00) mg m(-3), and 33.9 (2.3-504) µg m(-3), respectively. During 10 years of follow-up, the exposure to total dust, fluorides, and PAH decreased by 9.2, 11.7, and 14.9% per year, respectively. Each model encompassed from 49 to 72 significant components of the interaction terms. The interaction components were at least as important as the main effects, and 65 to 91% of the significant components of the interaction terms were time-dependent.
Our prediction models indicated that exposures were highly time-dependent. We expect that the time-dependent changes in exposure are of major importance for longitudinal studies of health effects in the aluminum industry.
Notes
Cites: J Occup Environ Med. 2014 May;56(5 Suppl):S40-5924806725
Cites: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Dec;26(6):461-911201392
Cites: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Dec;26(6):470-511201393
Cites: Ann Occup Hyg. 2001 Jan;45(1):71-8111137701
Cites: Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Jul;144(1):10-62064113
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2010 Oct;67(10):679-8520798006
Cites: J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Nov;49(11):1269-8717993932
Cites: Am J Ind Med. 1999 Feb;35(2):164-749894540
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1995 Apr;52(4):255-617795741
Cites: Thorax. 1994 Oct;49(10):984-97974315
Cites: J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Oct;49(10):1105-2318000416
Cites: Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Oct;52(7):623-3318653641
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Feb 1;139(3):250-628116600
Cites: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):89-9924022670
Cites: Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 Sep;44(6):475-8210963712