Neighbourhoods are frequently used as a measure for individuals' exposure to the food environment. However, the definitions of neighbourhoods fluctuate and have not been applied consistently in previous studies. Neighbourhoods defined from a single fixed location fail to capture people's complete exposure in multiple locations, but measuring behaviour using traditional methods can be challenging. This study compares the traditional methods of measuring exposure to the food environment to methods that use data from GPS tracking. For each of the 187 participants, 11 different neighbourhoods were created in which the exposure to supermarkets and fast food outlets were measured. ANOVA, Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test and t-tests were performed to compare the neighbourhoods. Significant differences were found between area sizes and the exposure to supermarkets and fast food outlets for different neighbourhood types. Second, significant differences in exposure to food outlets were found between the urban and rural neighbourhoods. Neighbourhoods are clearly a diffused and blurred concept that varies in meaning depending on each person's perception and the conducted study. Complexity and heterogeneity of human mobility no longer appear to correspond to the use of residential neighbourhoods but rather emphasise the need for methods, concepts and measures of individual activity and exposure.
Notes
Cites: Int J Health Geogr. 2007;6:417295912
Cites: Am J Health Promot. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(4 Suppl):317-2517465177
Cites: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Jun;61(6):491-817496257
Cites: Public Health. 2008 Jul;122(7):681-9018207475
Cites: Health Place. 2009 Mar;15(1):193-718499502
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4 Suppl):S134-4419285204
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4 Suppl):S145-5019285205