Large carnivores were persecuted to near extinction during the last centuries, but have now recovered in some countries. It has been proposed earlier that the recovery of the Northern European brown bear is supported by migration from Russia. We tested this hypothesis by obtaining for the first time continuous sampling of the whole Finnish bear population, which is located centrally between the Russian and Scandinavian bear populations. The Finnish population is assumed to experience high gene flow from Russian Karelia. If so, no or a low degree of genetic differentiation between Finnish and Russian bears could be expected. We have genotyped bears extensively from all over Finland using 12 validated microsatellite markers and compared their genetic composition to bears from Russian Karelia, Sweden, and Norway. Our fine masked investigation identified two overlapping genetic clusters structured by isolation-by-distance in Finland (pairwise FST = 0.025). One cluster included Russian bears, and migration analyses showed a high number of migrants from Russia into Finland, providing evidence of eastern gene flow as an important driver during recovery. In comparison, both clusters excluded bears from Sweden and Norway, and we found no migrants from Finland in either country, indicating that eastern gene flow was probably not important for the population recovery in Scandinavia. Our analyses on different spatial scales suggest a continuous bear population in Finland and Russian Karelia, separated from Scandinavia.
Notes
Cites: Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):305-1811298947
Cites: Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-5910835412
Cites: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 1;100(7):4334-912655042
Cites: Mol Ecol. 2004 Jan;13(1):55-6514653788
Cites: Mol Ecol. 2004 May;13(5):1327-3115078468
Cites: J Hered. 2004 Nov-Dec;95(6):536-915475402
Cites: Science. 1987 May 15;236(4803):787-923576198
Cites: Mol Ecol. 1994 Oct;3(5):489-957952329
Cites: Mol Ecol. 1995 Jun;4(3):347-547663752
Cites: Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1413-97498780
Cites: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9197-2019256459
Cites: Mol Ecol. 1997 Sep;6(9):869-769301075
Cites: Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-2015969739
Cites: Genetics. 2005 Jul;170(3):1261-8015520263
Cites: Science. 2005 Aug 19;309(5738):1239-4116037416
Cites: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 22;272(1579):2409-1616243699
Cites: Mol Ecol. 2008 Apr;17(7):1685-70118371014
Cites: Biol Lett. 2009 Feb 23;5(1):35-818842564
Cites: Mol Ecol. 2010 Dec;19(24):5359-7021044194
Cites: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Nov;5(5):501-521106449
Cites: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 7;279(1730):910-521849323
Cites: Mol Ecol. 2012 Jul;21(14):3474-8822680614
Cites: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Dec;6(6):798-80922483764
Cites: Mol Ecol. 2000 Apr;9(4):421-3110736045
Cites: Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):520-211823858