The Walton Report on cervical cancer screening programs recently recommended a new program for screening for cervical cancer based on chronologic age, calling for 3- and 5-year intervals between examinations. It recommended that such examinations be discontinued after 60 years of age. In a group of 232 routinely examined women (aged 18 to 47 years) in whom cervical intraepithelial neoplasia developed the timing of onset of the disease and the implications for screening were studied. The average age at the time of diagnosis was 30 years; in 20% of the patients the diagnosis had been made after age 35. The screening program recommended in the Walton Report would have been effective in diagnosing most cases (80%) in this sample by age 35 and all by age 60. However, when the patients were grouped according to age at the time of first intercourse, the diagnosis had been made after age 35 in only 13% of those who started having intercourse at age 15 to 17 years, 20% of those who started at age 18 to 19 years and 33% of those who started at age 20 years of later. When the times of diagnosis were expressed by number of years of intercourse the distributions became uniform in the same three groups; in 72% of all the patients the diagnosis had been made within the first 15 years of intercourse, in 88% it had been made within 20 years and in 100% it had been made by 30 years. These data suggest that a program based on number of years of intercourse may be more uniform and more efficient than one based on chronologic age, and that cytologic examinations should be concentrated during the time when most cases develop -- 6 to 20 years after the time of first intercourse.
Notes
Cites: JAMA. 1960 Dec 3;174(14):1847-5112259009
Cites: Lancet. 1965 Oct 16;2(7416):756-94157809
Cites: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1966 Feb;6(1):30-45218307
Cites: Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):163-705910392
Cites: Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1967 May;57(5):840-76067208
Cites: Cancer Res. 1967 Apr;27(4):603-176025727
Cites: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967 Jul 15;98(6):792-96027707
Cites: Cancer. 1968 Apr;21(4):663-715643761
Cites: Cancer Res. 1968 Apr;28(4):695-7065649059
Cites: Cancer. 1969 Feb;23(2):458-605764984
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1969 May;89(5):547-545818824
Cites: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Oct 1;105(3):386-935810787
Cites: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Sep 1;126(1):110-5961736
Cites: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Oct 15;126(4):418-21984102
Cites: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jul 15;131(6):620-3581144
Cites: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980 Nov 19;210(1180):411-216109302