Physicians' response to acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is poorly understood and often attributed to fear of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection through occupational exposure. We surveyed 268 physicians from three geographic regions in North American with different specialties and responsibilities for HIV-positive patients. An important difference was found between the published risk and the physicians' perceived risk of infection after a single occupational exposure. Almost half of the respondents stated that they feared contracting AIDS more than other diseases. The physicians who perceived themselves to be at high physical risk were more likely than the others to report that AIDS had changed the way they interact with their patients (r = 0.26, p less than 0.001). No relation was found between the perception of physical risk and the number of HIV-infected patients (r = -0.07, p = 0.15). However, the perception of social risk showed a small inverse correlation (r = -0.15, p less than 0.02), in which the physicians with more HIV-infected patients reported less concern about negative social consequences. The physicians who perceived themselves to be at high personal risk were more likely than the others to report that surgeons have the right to refuse patients who do not wish to undergo HIV antibody testing (r = -0.16, p less than 0.01 for physical risk; r = -0.29, p less than 0.001 for social risk). Multiple regression analyses indicated that physicians' perception of physical risk was not related to age or sex but was modestly related to income source. The perception of social risk was related to sex and income source. Physicians' perception of personal risk is a crucial, yet often unacknowledged, component of the fight against AIDS. Our findings suggest that lack of attention to this issue is seriously compromising initiatives designed to facilitate physician participation in AIDS care.
Notes
Cites: CMAJ. 1987 Dec 1;137(11):1036-93676949
Cites: JAMA. 1987 Oct 9;258(14):19403656608
Cites: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Jan 9;296(6615):803122963
Cites: Med J Aust. 1988 Mar 7;148(5):221-53343951
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1988 Apr;78(4):455-93348474
Cites: N Engl J Med. 1988 Jun 23;318(25):1686-903374540
Cites: N Y State J Med. 1988 May;88(5):223-73380379
Cites: JAMA. 1988 Jul 22-29;260(4):519-233290525
Cites: Minn Med. 1988 May;71(5):277-833405166
Cites: JAMA. 1988 Dec 16;260(23):3481-33062200
Cites: CMAJ. 1989 Mar 15;140(6):597-6022920335
Cites: J Occup Med. 1986 Sep;28(9):821-43534165
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1985 Nov;103(5):787-904051355
Cites: JAMA. 1978 Jan 16;239(3):210-12579391
Cites: J Gen Intern Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;1(5):287-943772617
Cites: J Med Educ. 1987 Jan;62(1):53-43795243
Cites: Public Health Rep. 1987 May-Jun;102(3):248-543108938
Cites: Law Med Health Care. 1986 Dec;14(5-6):281-93649518