To determine the frequency of major adverse events among patients awaiting coronary revascularization; to assess the match between referring physicians' estimates of urgency, a computer-generated multifactorial urgency rating score and actual waiting times; to determine the changes in waiting times as capacity for bypass surgery increased; and to evaluate the influence of choice of procedure or operator on waiting times.
Consecutive case series.
Greater Toronto region.
All 571 patients referred to an organized referral office by cardiologists at hospitals without on-site revascularization facilities between Jan. 3, 1989, and June 30, 1991.
Preoperative fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction; proportions of patients waiting longer than the maximum period recommended for their urgency rating; mean waiting times for various subgroups; and correlations among referring physicians' urgency ratings, computer-generated multifactorial urgency scores and waiting times.
Of the 496 patients accepted for a procedure 5 had fatal cardiac events and 3 nonfatal myocardial infarction. Events occurred three times more often in patients with left mainstem disease than in those in other anatomic categories (relative risk [RR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48 to 6.27, p = 0.03). Both the computer-generated scores and the referring physicians' scores were correlated with the actual waiting time (r = 0.46 and 0.57 respectively). Waiting times and the proportion of patients with excessive waiting times fell during the study period (p
Notes
Cites: Circulation. 1976 Sep;54(3):522-3947585
Cites: Heart Lung. 1985 Jan;14(1):40-43871431
Cites: CMAJ. 1992 Mar 15;146(6):921-51544079
Cites: Health Aff (Millwood). 1991 Fall;10(3):110-281748371
Cites: JAMA. 1991 Aug 28;266(8):1108-111865544
Cites: JAMA. 1991 Aug 28;266(8):1091-61865541
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 1990 Oct;6(8):319-222268793
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1991 Feb 15;114(4):325-311899012
Cites: Chest. 1992 Mar;101(3):715-221541137
Cites: Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9):784-922402173
Cites: N Z Med J. 1990 Aug 8;103(895):371-22385399
