This study examined how several healthy behaviors among women in Ontario and the United States explained (1) the use of preventive health services, (2) differences in use between socioeconomic groups, and (3) differences in use between the two health systems.
1990 data on women from the Ontario Health Survey (n = 22,985) and the US National Health Interview Survey (n = 19,092) were analyzed. A woman who avoided smoking and obesity, used seatbelts, and regularly engaged in aerobic exercise was defined as having a healthy lifestyle. Women were considered screened if they reported a mammogram or a breast exam within the previous year or a Pap smear within 2 years.
A healthy lifestyle was more common in the United States than Canada among more highly educated groups (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22, 1.60 for college educated) but less common in the United States for those with less than a high school education (OR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.40, 0.67). Each additional unhealthy behavior decreased the odds of having undergone a mammogram in the previous year by 20%. However, adjusting for the number of unhealthy behaviors did not substantially change the relationship between socioeconomic status and use of preventive services.
The number of healthy behaviors is an important measure of demand for preventive health services. This measure varies across country and socioeconomic group.
Notes
Cites: JAMA. 1994 Aug 17;272(7):530-48046807
Cites: Health Rep. 1993;5(2):143-568292755
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1984 Dec;74(12):1331-96507684
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1988 Aug;78(8):983-43389440
Cites: Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87-1213066632
Cites: J Health Soc Behav. 1988 Jun;29(2):113-263243970
Cites: Int J Epidemiol. 1989;18(3 Suppl 1):S203-92681019
Cites: Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(8):899-9082031206
Cites: Lancet. 1991 Jun 8;337(8754):1387-931674771
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 1991 Mar-Apr;7(2):69-741910890
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 1991 Jul-Aug;7(4):219-261756058
Cites: Health Rep. 1991;3(4):363-701818734
Cites: J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Nov-Dec;7(6):615-221453245
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 1992 Nov-Dec;8(6):351-91482575