In this study, we used both case-crossover and time-series analyses to assess the associations between size-fractionated particulate matter and asthma hospitalization among children 6-12 years old living in Toronto between 1981 and 1993. Specifically, we used exposures averaged over periods varying from 1 to 7 days to assess the effects of particulate matter on asthma hospitalization. We calculated estimates of the relative risk of asthma hospitalization adjusted for daily weather conditions (maximum and minimum temperatures, and average relative humidity) for an incremental exposure corresponding to the interquartile range in particulate matter. Both bidirectional case-crossover and time-series analyses revealed that coarse particulate matter (PM10-2.5) averaged over 5-6 days was significantly associated with asthma hospitalization in both males and females. The magnitude of this effect appeared to increase with increasing number of days of exposure averaging for most models, with the relative risk estimates stabilizing at about 6 days. Using a bidirectional case-crossover analysis, the estimated relative risks were 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02, 1.28] for males and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.02, 1.36) for females, for an increment of 8.4 microg/m(3) in 6-day averages of PM10-2.5. The corresponding relative risk estimates were 1.10 and 1.18, respectively, when we used time-series analysis. The effect of PM10-2.5 remained positive after adjustment for the effects of the gaseous pollutants carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone (O3). We did not find significant effects of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) or of thoracic particulate matter (PM10) on asthma hospitalizations using either of these two analytic approaches. For the most part, relative risk estimates from the unidirectional case-crossover analysis were more pronounced compared with both bidirectional case-crossover and time-series analyses.
Notes
Cites: N Engl J Med. 1995 Jan 19;332(3):133-87800004
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jul 1;142(1):91-87785679
Cites: Epidemiology. 1995 Sep;6(5):476-848562622
Cites: Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 Suppl 6:235-428549479
Cites: J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Apr;50 Suppl 1:S3-118758217
Cites: Thorax. 1996 Nov;51(11):1109-148958894
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1997 Feb;54(2):108-169072018
Cites: Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Feb;105(2):216-229105797
Cites: Epidemiology. 1997 Mar;8(2):162-79229208
Cites: J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1998 Apr-Jun;8(2):129-449577746
Cites: Biometrics. 1998 Jun;54(2):596-6059629646
Cites: J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1998 Aug;48(8):689-7009739623
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1998 Dec;88(12):1761-69842371
Cites: Epidemiology. 1999 Jan;10(1):23-309888276
Cites: Arch Environ Health. 1999 Mar-Apr;54(2):130-910094292
Cites: Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107(6):489-9310339450
Cites: Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Aug;107(8):629-3110417359
Cites: Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Aug;107(8):633-610417360