To study the possible work related reasons for the increased incidence of many cancers among seafarers.
A case-control study, nested in a cohort of all male seafarers (n = 30 940) who, according to the files of the Seamen's Pension Fund, had worked on board Finnish ships for any time during the period 1960-80. Cases of cancer of the lung, nervous system, kidney, and pancreas, leukaemia, lymphoma, and all cases histologically defined as mesotheliomas were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry in 1967-92. The preceding numbers of years at sea in various occupational categories were collected according to the type of ship (dry cargo ship, tanker, passenger vessel, icebreaker, other vessel).
The incidence for lung cancer among engine crew increased with the increase in employment time, the odds ratio (OR) after three years being 1.68 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.41). The OR of lung cancer for deck officers was 0.42 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.61). Deck personnel on icebreakers had a significantly increased risk of lung cancer > or =20 years after first employment (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.23 to 9.49). The OR for mesothelioma among engine crew with a latency of 20 years was 9.75 (95% CI 1.88 to 50.6). The OR for renal cancer among deck officers after three years employment was 2.15 (95% CI 1.14 to 4.08), but there was no increase by employment time or by latency. A rise of OR for lymphoma was detected among deck personnel on tankers, if the employment had lasted over three years (OR 2.78, 95% CI 0.98 to 7.92). The risk pattern for leukaemia was similar to that of lymphoma, the OR among deck personnel on tankers varying from 2.26 (95% CI 1.01 to 5.06) to 6.86 (95% CI 1.62 to 28.8) depending on the length of employment.
Results indicate that occupational exposures of deck crews on tankers add to their risk of renal cancer, leukaemia, and possibly lymphoma. Engine crews have an asbestos related risk of mesothelioma, and the engine room conditions also seem to increase risk of lung cancer.
Notes
Cites: Ann Occup Hyg. 1987;31(3):345-553426034
Cites: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1983 Dec 10;103(34-36):2312-66665778
Cites: Am J Ind Med. 1988;14(6):657-93232685
Cites: Am J Ind Med. 1990;17(6):711-252343876
Cites: Br J Ind Med. 1990 May;47(5):292-72357448
Cites: Am J Ind Med. 1991;19(5):673-62053581
Cites: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991 Dec 31;643:321-321809146
Cites: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1983 Dec 10;103(34-36):2317-206665779
Cites: J Occup Med. 1985 Dec;27(12):881-44087053
Cites: Br J Cancer. 1992 Sep;66(3):568-781520596
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 1994 Dec;51(12):804-117849863
Cites: Am J Ind Med. 1995 Apr;27(4):555-647793425
Cites: Ann Occup Hyg. 1995 Jun;39(3):347-617793753
Cites: Bull Inst Marit Trop Med Gdynia. 1993-1994;44-45(1-4):65-737580353
Cites: Cancer Causes Control. 1996 Mar;7(2):231-98740736
Cites: J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Aug;40(8):675-99729749