Surveys originating from universities appear to have higher response rates than those from commercial sources. In light of the growing scrutiny placed on physician-industry relations, the present study aimed to determine the impact of the pharmaceutical industry versus university sponsorship on response to a postal survey completed by Canadian hepatitis C virus (HCV) care providers.
In the present controlled trial, 229 physicians and nurses involved in HCV treatment were randomly assigned to receive a survey with sponsorship from a pharmaceutical company or university. The primary outcome was the proportion of completed surveys returned. The secondary outcomes included the response rate after the first mailing and the number of days taken to respond.
One hundred fifteen participants were randomly assigned to receive the pharmaceutical industry survey and 114 were assigned to receive the university survey. The final response rate was 72.9% (167 of 229), which did not differ between the industry and university groups (RR=0.91; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.07). Nurses (OR=2.20; 95% CI 1.08 to 4.48) and participants from an academic centre (OR=3.14; 95% CI 1.64 to 6.00) were more likely to respond. The response rate after the first mailing (RR=0.85; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.07) and the median number of days taken to respond (21 days in both groups; P=0.20) did not differ between the industry and university groups.
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship does not appear to negatively impact response rates to a postal survey completed by Canadian HCV care providers.
Notes
Cites: Fam Pract. 2002 Feb;19(1):105-1111818359
Cites: Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;20(4):281-416609758
Cites: Can J Gastroenterol. 2002 Feb;16(2):87-9311875592
Cites: BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):118312016181
Cites: Can J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jun;16(6):369-7412096300
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17;137(6):511-2012230353
Cites: Can J Gastroenterol. 2002 Nov;16(11):801-512464974
Cites: Can J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jan;17(1):25-912560851
Cites: Can J Gastroenterol. 2003 Mar;17(3):183-612677268
Cites: Can J Gastroenterol. 2003 May;17(5):313-712772005
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 28;351(18):1891-90015509824
Cites: BMJ. 1997 Nov 1;315(7116):11369374887
Cites: Can J Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep;19(9):553-816151547