To determine rates of screening for osteoporosis among men older than 65 years and to find out whether family physicians are following the recommendations of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada's 2002 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Canada.
Chart audit.
The Family Medicine Centre at Hotel Dieu Hospital in Kingston, Ont.
All male patients at the Family Medicine Centre older than 65 years for a total of 565 patients associated with 20 different physicians' practices.
Rates of screening with bone mineral density (BMD) scans for osteoporosis, results of BMD testing, and associations between results of BMD testing and age.
Of the 565 patients reviewed, 108 (19.1% of the study population) had received BMD testing. Rates of screening ranged from 0% to 38% in the 20 practices. Among 105 patients tested (reports for 3 patients were not retrievable), 15 (14.3%) were found to have osteoporosis, 43 (41.0%) to have osteopenia, and 47 (44.8%) to have normal BMD results. No significant association was found between BMD results and age. Screening rates were higher among men older than 75 years than among men aged 65 to 75 and peaked among those 85 to 89 years old.
On average, only about 20% of male patients older than 65 years had been screened for osteoporosis, so most of these men were not being screened by BMD testing as recommended in the guidelines. Considering the relatively high rates of osteoporosis and osteopenia found in this study and the known morbidity and mortality associated with osteoporotic fractures in this population, higher rates of BMD screening and more widespread treatment of osteoporosis could prevent many fractures among these patients. Family physicians need to become more aware of the risk factors indicating screening, and barriers to screening and treatment of osteoporosis in men need to be identified and addressed.
Notes
Cites: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2001 Jul;15(3):415-2711485338
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 28;162(19):2217-2212390065
Cites: CMAJ. 2002 Nov 12;167(10 Suppl):S1-3412427685
Cites: Am Fam Physician. 2003 Apr 1;67(7):1521-612722852
Cites: CMAJ. 2000 Oct 31;163(9):1139-4311079058
Cites: Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(8):680-711095171
Cites: Can Fam Physician. 2000 Nov;46:2228-3511143582
Cites: JAMA. 2001 Feb 14;285(6):785-9511176917
Cites: Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2001 Feb;27(1):19-4711285995
Cites: Can Fam Physician. 2003 Apr;49:405-7, 412-412729232
Cites: Can Fam Physician. 2003 Apr;49:462-812729242