The use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), particularly the routine implementation of evidence-based cardiovascular health maintenance and disease management recommendations, affords both expert and nonexpert practitioners the opportunity to achieve better, and at least theoretically similar, patient outcomes. However, health care practitioners are often stymied in their efforts to follow even well-researched and well-written CPGs as a consequence of contradictory information. The purposeful integration and harmonization of Canadian cardiovascular CPGs, regardless of their specific risk factor or clinical management focus, is critical to their widespread acceptance and implementation. This level of cooperation and coordination among CPG groups and organizations would help to ensure that their clinical practice roadmaps (ie, best practice recommendations) contain clear, concise and complementary, rather than contradictory, patient care information. Similarly, the application of specific tools intended to improve the quality of CPGs, such as the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) assessment tool, may also lead to improvements in CPG quality and potentially enhance their acceptance and implementation.
Notes
Cites: Health Technol Assess. 2004 Feb;8(6):iii-iv, 1-7214960256
Cites: Circulation. 2004 Jun 29;109(25):3112-2115226228
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2004 Oct;20(12):1195-815494770
Cites: BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-28555924
Cites: BMJ. 1999 Feb 20;318(7182):527-3010024268
Cites: BMJ. 1999 Mar 6;318(7184):661-410066215
Cites: Circulation. 2005 Feb 1;111(4):499-51015687140
Cites: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 4;46(7):1242-816198838
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2005 Oct;21 Suppl D:3D-19D16292364
Cites: CMAJ. 2005 Nov 22;173(11):1297, 129916301688