An accurate estimate of the total number of cases and severity of illness of an emerging infectious disease is required both to define the burden of the epidemic and to determine the severity of disease. When a novel pathogen first appears, affected individuals with severe symptoms are more likely to be diagnosed. Accordingly, the total number of cases will be underestimated and disease severity overestimated. This problem is manifest in the current epidemic of novel influenza A/H1N1.
We used a simple approach to leverage measures of incident influenza A/H1N1 among a relatively small and well observed group of US, UK, Spanish and Canadian travelers who had visited Mexico to estimate the incidence among a much larger and less well surveyed population of Mexican residents. We estimate that a minimum of 113,000 to 375,000 cases of novel influenza A/H1N1 have occurred in Mexicans during the month of April, 2009. Such an estimate serves as a lower bound because it does not account for underreporting of cases in travelers or for nonrandom mixing between Mexican residents and visitors, which together could increase the estimates by more than an order of magnitude.
We find that the number of cases in Mexican residents may exceed the number of confirmed cases by two to three orders of magnitude. While the extent of disease spread is greater than previously appreciated, our estimate suggests that severe disease is uncommon since the total number of cases is likely to be much larger than those of confirmed cases.
Cites: JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):179-8612517228
Cites: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 29;359(1447):1091-10515306395
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Jul;110(1):1-6463858
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Sep 1;162(5):479-8616076827
Cites: Science. 2009 Jun 19;324(5934):1557-6119433588
Cites: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4639-4418332436