To examine the association between worktime control and subsequent disability pension among employees.
Two scores of worktime control (self-assessed and co-worker assessed) were obtained from a survey in 2000-2001 (score range 1-5) among 30 700 public sector employees (78% women) aged 18-64 years. Information on cause-specific disability pension during follow-up was collected from national registers.
During a mean follow-up of 4.4 years, 1178 employees were granted disability pensions (incidence per 1000 person-years: 9.2 in women and 8.7 in men). The most common causes of a disability pension were musculoskeletal disorders (43% of all pensions), mental disorders (25%), tumours (8%) and diseases of the circulatory system (6%) and nervous system (6%). A one unit increase in self-assessed and co-worker assessed worktime control score was associated with a 41-48% decrease in risk of disabling musculoskeletal disorders in men and a 33-35% decrease in women. This association was robust to adjustment for 17 baseline covariates (in men and women combined, adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.87 and 0.64, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.79 per one unit increase in self-assessed and co-worker assessed worktime control, respectively). Self-assessed, but not co-worker assessed, worktime control was also associated with risk of disability retirement due to mental disorders in women. Disability pensions from other disease categories were not related to worktime control.
In these public sector employees, high worktime control was associated with reduced risk of early retirement caused by musculoskeletal disorders independent of baseline characteristics.
Notes
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2006 Sep;63(9):608-1616728502
Cites: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):851-716166358
Cites: Psychol Med. 2007 Mar;37(3):373-8217121686
Cites: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Oct;61(10):915-2017873230
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;65(4):283-518198201
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 2008 May 15;167(10):1143-5118413361
Cites: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jan;63(1):24-3018768568
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2009 Apr;66(4):235-4219211774
Cites: BMJ. 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):971-510753148
Cites: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Apr;56(4):272-811896134
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Dec 1;156(11):985-9312446254
Cites: Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Dec;31(6):1183-9112540720
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2004 Mar;61(3):254-6114985521
Cites: Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:12-3015513650
Cites: Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:49-10815513654
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1983 Nov;73(11):1312-56414317
Cites: Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Dec;23(6):403-139476803
Cites: Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998;24 Suppl 3:13-79916812
Cites: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Mar;59(3):238-4215709085
Cites: Eur J Public Health. 2007 Feb;17(1):62-816777840