To investigate the nature and magnitude of relations of systolic and diastolic blood pressures in late adolescence to mortality.
Nationwide cohort study.
General community in Sweden.
Swedish men (n = 1,207,141) who had military conscription examinations between 1969 and 1995 at a mean age of 18.4 years, followed up for a median of 24 (range 0-37) years.
Total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and non-cardiovascular mortality.
During follow-up, 28,934 (2.4%) men died. The relation of systolic blood pressure to total mortality was U shaped, with the lowest risk at a systolic blood pressure of about 130 mm Hg. This pattern was driven by the relation to non-cardiovascular mortality, whereas the relation to cardiovascular mortality was monotonically increasing (higher risk with higher blood pressure). The relation of diastolic blood pressure to mortality risk was monotonically increasing and stronger than that of systolic blood pressure, in terms of both relative risk and population attributable fraction (deaths that could be avoided if blood pressure was in the optimal range). Relations to cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality were similar, with an apparent risk threshold at a diastolic blood pressure of about 90 mm Hg, below which diastolic blood pressure and mortality were unrelated, and above which risk increased steeply with higher diastolic blood pressures.
In adolescent men, the relation of diastolic blood pressure to mortality was more consistent than that of systolic blood pressure. Considering current efforts for earlier detection and prevention of risk, these observations emphasise the risk associated with high diastolic blood pressure in young adulthood.
Notes
Cites: BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):13915226191
Cites: JAMA. 2004 May 5;291(17):2107-1315126439
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1969 Dec;90(6):527-355362860
Cites: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Apr 9;296(6628):1021-53130122
Cites: Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1243-82401062
Cites: BMJ. 1993 Jan 23;306(6872):243-68443523
Cites: N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 23;329(26):1912-78247055
Cites: Lancet. 1995 Apr 1;345(8953):825-97898229
Cites: Circulation. 1995 Nov 1;92(9):2437-457586343
Cites: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Feb;27(2):277-848557894