Ethics and privacy issues of a practice-based surveillance system: need for a national-level institutional research ethics board and consent standards.
To describe the challenges the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) experienced with institutional research ethics boards (IREBs) when seeking approvals across jurisdictions and to provide recommendations for overcoming challenges of ethical review for multisite and multijurisdictional surveillance and research.
The CPCSSN project collects and validates longitudinal primary care health information (relating to hypertension, diabetes, depression, chronic obstructive lung disease, and osteoarthritis) from electronic medical records across Canada. Privacy and data storage security policies and processes have been developed to protect participants' privacy and confidentiality, and IREB approval is obtained in each participating jurisdiction. Inconsistent interpretation and application of privacy and ethical issues by IREBs delays and impedes research programs that could better inform us about chronic disease.
The CPCSSN project's experience with gaining approval from IREBs highlights the difficulty of conducting pan-Canadian health surveillance and multicentre research. Inconsistent IREB approvals to waive explicit individual informed consent produced particular challenges for researchers.
The CPCSSN experience highlights the need to develop a better process for researchers to obtain timely and consistent IREB approvals for multicentre surveillance and research. We suggest developing a specialized, national, centralized IREB responsible for approving multisite studies related to population health research.
Notes
Cites: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 May 7;95(9):636-712734305
Cites: Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):291-30715663714
Cites: J R Soc Med. 2005 Oct;98(10):444-716199810
Cites: Public Health. 2005 Nov;119(11):1003-1016185734
Cites: J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(4):e2817213047
Cites: J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):308-1418375687