"Completely out-at-sea" with "two-gender medicine": a qualitative analysis of physician-side barriers to providing healthcare for transgender patients.
Members of the transgender community have identified healthcare access barriers, yet a corresponding inquiry into healthcare provider perspectives has lagged. Our aim was to examine physician perceptions of barriers to healthcare provision for transgender patients.
This was a qualitative study with physician participants from Ontario, Canada. Semi-structured interviews were used to capture a progression of ideas related to barriers faced by physicians when caring for trans patients. Qualitative data were then transcribed verbatim and analysed with an emergent grounded theory approach.
A total of thirteen (13) physician participants were interviewed. Analysis revealed healthcare barriers that grouped into five themes: Accessing resources, medical knowledge deficits, ethics of transition-related medical care, diagnosing vs. pathologising trans patients, and health system determinants. A centralising theme of "not knowing where to go or who to talk to" was also identified.
The findings of this study show that physicians perceive barriers to the care of trans patients, and that these barriers are multifactorial. Access barriers impede physicians when referring patients to specialists or searching for reliable treatment information. Clinical management of trans patients is complicated by a lack of knowledge, and by ethical considerations regarding treatments--which can be unfamiliar or challenging to physicians. The disciplinary division of responsibilities within medicine further complicates care; few practitioners identify trans healthcare as an interest area, and there is a tendency to overemphasise trans status in mental health evaluations. Failure to recognise and accommodate trans patients within sex-segregated healthcare systems leads to deficient health policy. The findings of this study suggest potential solutions to trans healthcare barriers at the informational level--with increased awareness of clinical guidelines and by including trans health issues in medical education-and at the institutional level, with support for both trans-focused and trans-friendly primary care models.
Notes
Cites: Am J Public Health. 2001 Jun;91(6):869-7211392924
Cites: J LGBT Health Res. 2007;3(2):49-6119835041
Cites: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Jul;7(3):186-812171751
Cites: J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Jan;92(1):56-6514762463
Cites: Community Ment Health J. 2004 Feb;40(1):33-4615077727
Cites: J Sex Marital Ther. 2004 Jul-Sep;30(4):277-9415205065
Cites: Psychol Med. 2005 Jan;35(1):89-9915842032
Cites: Health Soc Work. 2005 Feb;30(1):19-2615847234
Cites: Am J Public Health. 2008 Jun;98(6):989-9518445789
Cites: J Homosex. 2008;54(3):243-5818825862
Cites: Qual Health Res. 2008 Oct;18(10):1345-5518832767
Cites: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009 Sep-Oct;20(5):341-719732693
Cites: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009 Sep-Oct;20(5):348-6119732694
Cites: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009 Sep-Oct;20(5):362-7219732695
Cites: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009 Sep-Oct;20(5):387-9719732697
Cites: J Sex Med. 2009 Oct;6(10):2736-4519619147
Cites: J LGBT Health Res. 2007;3(2):37-4719835040
Cites: Am J Public Health. 2001 Jun;91(6):990-111392949