For decades, the peopling of the Americas has been explored through the analysis of uniparentally inherited genetic systems in Native American populations and the comparison of these genetic data with current linguistic groupings. In northern North America, two language families predominate: Eskimo-Aleut and Na-Dene. Although the genetic evidence from nuclear and mtDNA loci suggest that speakers of these language families share a distinct biological origin, this model has not been examined using data from paternally inherited Y chromosomes. To test this hypothesis and elucidate the migration histories of Eskimoan- and Athapaskan-speaking populations, we analyzed Y-chromosomal data from Inuvialuit, Gwich'in, and Tlich populations living in the Northwest Territories of Canada. Over 100 biallelic markers and 19 chromosome short tandem repeats (STRs) were genotyped to produce a high-resolution dataset of Y chromosomes from these groups. Among these markers is an SNP discovered in the Inuvialuit that differentiates them from other Aboriginal and Native American populations. The data suggest that Canadian Eskimoan- and Athapaskan-speaking populations are genetically distinct from one another and that the formation of these groups was the result of two population expansions that occurred after the initial movement of people into the Americas. In addition, the population history of Athapaskan speakers is complex, with the Tlich being distinct from other Athapaskan groups. The high-resolution biallelic data also make clear that Y-chromosomal diversity among the first Native Americans was greater than previously recognized.
Notes
Cites: Ann Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;63(Pt 1):63-8010738521
Cites: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012 Jul;148(3):422-3522549307
Cites: Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Apr;68(4):990-101811254455
Cites: Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Jan;70(1):192-20611731934
Cites: Am J Hum Genet. 2002 May;70(5):1377-80; author reply 1380-111951181
Cites: Int J Legal Med. 2002 Aug;116(4):212-512185491
Cites: Hum Genet. 2003 Apr;112(4):353-6312594533
Cites: Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Sep;73(3):524-3912900798
Cites: Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Jan;74(1):50-6114691732