Mercury in the Arctic is an important environmental and human health issue. The reliance of Northern Peoples on traditional foods, such as marine mammals, for subsistence means that they are particularly at risk from mercury exposure. The cycling of mercury in Arctic marine systems is reviewed here, with emphasis placed on the key sources, pathways and processes which regulate mercury levels in marine food webs and ultimately the exposure of human populations to this contaminant. While many knowledge gaps exist limiting our ability to make strong conclusions, it appears that the long-range transport of mercury from Asian emissions is an important source of atmospheric Hg to the Arctic and that mercury methylation resulting in monomethylmercury production (an organic form of mercury which is both toxic and bioaccumulated) in Arctic marine waters is the principal source of mercury incorporated into food webs. Mercury concentrations in biological organisms have increased since the onset of the industrial age and are controlled by a combination of abiotic factors (e.g., monomethylmercury supply), food web dynamics and structure, and animal behavior (e.g., habitat selection and feeding behavior). Finally, although some Northern Peoples have high mercury concentrations of mercury in their blood and hair, harvesting and consuming traditional foods have many nutritional, social, cultural and physical health benefits which must be considered in risk management and communication.
Notes
Cites: J Nutr. 2011 Sep;141(9):1746-5321753059
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 1;45(21):9262-721910490
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Dec 15;45(24):10477-8422050654
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Oct 2;46(19):10514-2222779785
Cites: Environ Res. 2012 Nov;119:101-1722559948
Cites: Environ Res. 2012 Nov;119:27-4122572623
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Feb 15;45(4):1458-6521214235
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 May 15;43(10):3646-5119544867
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2000 Jan 17;245(1-3):61-7210682356
Cites: Toxicol Lett. 2000 Mar 15;112-113:119-2510720720
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2000 Jun 8;255(1-3):21-710898392
Cites: Annu Rev Nutr. 2000;20:595-62610940347
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2000 Oct 2;259(1-3):23-911032132
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Jan 15;36(2):174-811827051
Cites: Environ Pollut. 2002;117(1):133-4511843528
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2003 May 1;306(1-3):133-5812699923
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Oct 1;40(19):5911-617051778
Cites: Mar Pollut Bull. 2007 Jan;54(1):72-8017049950
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2007 Feb 1;373(1):178-9517169406
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Dec 15;40(24):7590-617256499
Cites: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Apr;73(7):2230-817293515
Cites: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7477-8217456601
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Nov 15;407(23):6044-5119766293
Cites: Hypertension. 2009 Nov;54(5):981-619805642
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Dec 1;407(24):6120-3119781740
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Mar 1;44(5):1630-720104887
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Mar 1;44(5):1698-70420121085
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Aug 1;44(15):5805-1120617840
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2010 Oct 1;408(21):5137-4620696465
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2010 Oct 15;408(22):5165-23420728918
Cites: Water Res. 2003 May;37(10):2496-50412727262
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Aug 1;37(15):3289-9712966972
Cites: J Nutr. 2004 Jun;134(6):1447-5315173410
Cites: Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Jun 1;38(11):3004-1015224728
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2004 Sep 20;331(1-3):29-5215325140
Cites: Arctic Med Res. 1988;47 Suppl 1:163-73272598