Investigating public perceptions and knowledge translation priorities to improve water safety for residents with private water supplies: a cross-sectional study in Newfoundland and Labrador.
The first objective of this study was to investigate the public perceptions of private water and alternative sources with respect to safety, quality, testing and treatment in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), Canada. The second objective was to provide public health practitioners with recommendations for improving knowledge translation (KT) efforts in NL, based on assessments of respondents' perceived information needs and preferred KT methods.
A cross-sectional telephone survey of 618 households with private water supplies was conducted in March-April, 2007. Questions pertained to respondents' perceptions of their tap water, water concerns, alternative water use, well characteristics, and water testing behaviours.
Approximately 94% of households were supplied by private wells (50% drilled and 50% dug wells), while 6% obtained water from roadside ponds, rivers or springs (RPRS). While 85% rated their water quality highly, 55% nevertheless had concerns about its overall safety. Approximately 11% of respondents never tested their water, and of the 89% that had, 80% tested at frequencies below provincial recommendations for bacterial testing. More than one-third of respondents reported treating their water in the home, and 78% employed active carbon filtration methods. Respondents wanted more information on testing options and advice on effective treatment methods. Targeted advertising through television, flyers/brochures and/or radio is recommended as a first step to increase awareness. More active KT methods involving key stakeholders may be most effective in improving testing and treatment behaviour.
The results presented here can assist public health practitioners in tailoring current KT initiatives to influence well owner stewardship behaviour.
Notes
Cites: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2004 Oct 22-Nov 26;67(20-22):1679-70415371209
Cites: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2004 Oct 22-Nov 26;67(20-22):1619-4215371205
Cites: Can J Public Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;96(4):254-816625790
Cites: J Water Health. 2008 Dec;6(4):521-518401117
Cites: Sci Total Environ. 2007 Dec 15;388(1-3):54-6517915294
Cites: BMC Public Health. 2006;6:9416608511
Cites: J Water Health. 2009 Jun;7(2):276-9219240354
Cites: CMAJ. 2010 Jul 13;182(10):1061-420231341
Cites: J Water Health. 2010 Dec;8(4):671-8620705979
Cites: J Environ Manage. 2011 Apr;92(4):1104-1421185114
Cites: J Water Health. 2011 Jun;9(2):241-5221942190
Cites: BMC Public Health. 2012;12:55622834485
Cites: Can Commun Dis Rep. 2001 Nov 15;27(22):185-9211729455
Cites: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003 Mar;70(3):447-5412592517
Cites: Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(3):7-1412638998
Cites: J Water Health. 2006 Mar;4(1):125-3816604844