Skip header and navigation

Refine By

4 records – page 1 of 1.

Timing of complementary feeding and associations with maternal and infant characteristics: A Norwegian cross-sectional study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature299492
Source
PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0199455
Publication Type
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Date
2018
Author
Christine Helle
Elisabet R Hillesund
Nina C Øverby
Author Affiliation
Department of Public Health, Sport and Nutrition, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Source
PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0199455
Date
2018
Language
English
Publication Type
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Keywords
Adolescent
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant Food
Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Norway
Nutrition Surveys
Time Factors
Young Adult
Abstract
Norwegian Health authorities recommend solid food to be introduced between child age 4-6 months, depending on both the mother´s and infant's needs. The aim of this paper is to describe timing of complementary feeding in a current sample of Norwegian mother/infant-dyads and explore potential associations between timing of introduction to solid foods and a wide range of maternal and infant characteristics known from previous literature to influence early feeding interactions. The paper is based on data from the Norwegian randomized controlled trial Early Food for Future Health. In 2016, a total of 715 mothers completed a web-based questionnaire at child age 5.5 months. We found that 5% of the infants were introduced to solid food before 4 months of age, while 14% were not introduced to solid food at 5.5 months of age. Introduction of solid food before 4 months of age was associated with the infant not being exclusive breastfed the first month, receiving only formula milk at 3 months, the mother being younger, not married/cohabitant, smoking, less educated and having more economic difficulties. Not being introduced to solid food at 5.5 months was associated with the infant being a girl, being exclusive breastfed the first month, receiving only breastmilk at 3 months, the mother being older, married and having 3 or more children. This study shows that there are still clear socioeconomic differences regarding timing of complementary feeding in Norway. Infants of younger, less educated and smoking mothers are at higher risk of not being fed in compliance with the official infant feeding recommendations. Our findings emphasize the importance of targeting socioeconomically disadvantaged mothers for support on healthy feeding practices focusing on the infant`s needs to prevent early onset of social inequalities in health.
PubMed ID
29949644 View in PubMed
Less detail

Changes in beverage consumption from pre-pregnancy to early pregnancy in the Norwegian Fit for Delivery study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature270544
Source
Public Health Nutr. 2015 May;18(7):1187-96
Publication Type
Article
Date
May-2015
Author
Marianne Skreden
Elling Bere
Linda R Sagedal
Ingvild Vistad
Nina C Øverby
Source
Public Health Nutr. 2015 May;18(7):1187-96
Date
May-2015
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Alcoholic Beverages - adverse effects
Animals
Beverages - adverse effects
Coffee - adverse effects
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diet - adverse effects
Educational Status
Female
Fruit and Vegetable Juices
Humans
Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Milk
Non-Nutritive Sweeteners - administration & dosage - adverse effects
Norway
Nutrition Policy
Nutrition Surveys
Patient compliance
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Young Adult
Abstract
To describe changes in consumption of different types of beverages from pre-pregnancy to early pregnancy, and to examine associations with maternal age, educational level and BMI.
Cross-sectional design. Participants answered an FFQ at inclusion into a randomized controlled trial, the Fit for Delivery (FFD) trial, in median gestational week 15 (range: 9-20), reporting current consumption and in retrospect how often they drank the different beverages pre-pregnancy.
Eight local antenatal clinics in southern Norway from September 2009 to February 2013.
Five hundred and seventy-five healthy pregnant nulliparous women.
Pre-pregnancy, 27 % reported drinking alcohol at least once weekly, compared with none in early pregnancy (P
PubMed ID
25221910 View in PubMed
Less detail

High intake of added sugar among Norwegian children and adolescents.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature30475
Source
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Apr;7(2):285-93
Publication Type
Article
Date
Apr-2004
Author
Nina C Øverby
Inger T L Lillegaard
Lars Johansson
Lene F Andersen
Author Affiliation
Institute for Nutrition Research, University of Oslo, Box 1046, Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. ninaco@basalmed.uio.no
Source
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Apr;7(2):285-93
Date
Apr-2004
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adolescent
Age Distribution
Analysis of Variance
Body mass index
Child
Child, Preschool
Diet
Diet Records
Dietary Sucrose - administration & dosage
Energy intake
Exercise - physiology
Female
Fruit
Health promotion
Humans
Male
Micronutrients - administration & dosage
Norway
Nutrition Surveys
Nutritive Value
Obesity - epidemiology - etiology
Parents - education - psychology
Public Health
Questionnaires
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Vegetables
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It is debated whether the intake of added sugar displaces micronutrient-rich foods and dilutes the nutrient density of the diet, and whether there is a link between sugar and the increased rate of obesity. The objectives of this study were to examine the effect of added sugar on the intakes of energy, micronutrients, fruit and vegetables, and to examine the association between intake of added sugar and age, sex, body mass index, physical activity, inactivity and parents' education. DESIGN: Participants recorded their food intake in pre-coded food diaries for 4 days and filled in a questionnaire about physical activity, watching television (TV)/using a personal computer (PC) and parents' education. SUBJECTS: Three hundred and ninety-one 4-year-olds, 810 students in the 4th grade (9 years old) and 1005 in the 8th grade (13 years old) were included in the study. RESULTS: The intakes of all nutrients, except alpha-tocopherol among 4-year-olds and vitamin C among 4-year-olds and 4th graders, decreased with increasing content of added sugar in the diet. Moreover, high consumers of added sugar had a 30-40% lower intake of fruit and vegetables than did low consumers. A negative association was observed between consumption of added sugar and body mass index among girls in the 8th grade (P=0.013), whereas a positive association was observed among 4-year-old boys (P=0.055). Associations between physical activity, hours spent watching TV/using a PC, parents' education and the energy intake from added sugar varied in the different age groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a negative association between the intake of added sugar and intakes of micronutrients, fruit and vegetables. The negative association between sugar intake and intake of fruit and vegetables is important from a public health perspective, since one of the main health messages today is to increase current intake of fruit and vegetables.
PubMed ID
15003136 View in PubMed
Less detail

Changes in fruit and vegetable consumption habits from pre-pregnancy to early pregnancy among Norwegian women.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature289259
Source
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 04 04; 17(1):107
Publication Type
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Date
04-04-2017
Author
Marianne Skreden
Elling Bere
Linda R Sagedal
Ingvild Vistad
Nina C Øverby
Author Affiliation
Department of Public Health, Sports and Nutrition, University of Agder, PO Box 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway. marianne.skreden@uia.no.
Source
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 04 04; 17(1):107
Date
04-04-2017
Language
English
Publication Type
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Keywords
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diet - methods
Feeding Behavior - physiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fruit
Fruit and Vegetable Juices
Habits
Humans
Incidence
Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology
Norway - epidemiology
Nutrition Surveys
Patient Education as Topic
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology - prevention & control
Pregnancy outcome
Retrospective Studies
Risk factors
Single-Blind Method
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vegetables
Women's health
Young Adult
Abstract
A healthy diet is important for pregnancy outcome and the current and future health of woman and child. The aims of the study were to explore the changes from pre-pregnancy to early pregnancy in consumption of fruits and vegetables (FV), and to describe associations with maternal educational level, body mass index (BMI) and age.
Healthy nulliparous women were included in the Norwegian Fit for Delivery (NFFD) trial from September 2009 to February 2013, recruited from eight antenatal clinics in southern Norway. At inclusion, in median gestational week 15 (range 9-20), 575 participants answered a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) where they reported consumption of FV, both current intake and recollection of pre-pregnancy intake. Data were analysed using a linear mixed model.
The percentage of women consuming FV daily or more frequently in the following categories increased from pre-pregnancy to early pregnancy: vegetables on sandwiches (13 vs. 17%, p?
Notes
Cites: BJOG. 2013 Dec;120(13):1642-53 PMID 23962347
Cites: Appetite. 2016 Feb 1;97:29-36 PMID 26581827
Cites: Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Mar;30(3):492-9 PMID 16331301
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2014 Sep;17(9):1919-29 PMID 24717981
Cites: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000 Sep;54(9):706-14 PMID 11002383
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jul;14(7):1222-8 PMID 21272414
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2009 Jul;12(7):922-31 PMID 18752697
Cites: BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 13;13:132 PMID 23406306
Cites: Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;64(3-4):332-9 PMID 25300277
Cites: Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Jan;11(1):20-32 PMID 23241065
Cites: JAMA. 2002 May 8;287(18):2414-23 PMID 11988062
Cites: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;62(4):463-70 PMID 17392696
Cites: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;60(3):364-71 PMID 16340954
Cites: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;62(4):471-9 PMID 17375108
Cites: J Nutr. 2009 Oct;139(10 ):1956-63 PMID 19710161
Cites: Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Jun;83(6):1369-79 PMID 16762949
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2013 Aug;16(8):1379-89 PMID 22877515
Cites: Adv Nutr. 2013 May 01;4(3):384S-92S PMID 23674808
Cites: Australas Med J. 2013 Nov 30;6(11):565-77 PMID 24348873
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2014 Sep;17(9):1930-8 PMID 23806144
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jun;19(9):1666-73 PMID 26573330
Cites: Placenta. 2012 Nov;33 Suppl 2:e30-4 PMID 22809673
Cites: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Feb 03;7:13 PMID 20181084
Cites: Nature. 2013 Aug 29;500(7464):585-8 PMID 23985875
Cites: Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100 Suppl 1:369S-77S PMID 24898225
Cites: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Feb;51(1):31-7 PMID 21299506
Cites: J Nutr. 2003 Jun;133(6):1997S-2002S PMID 12771353
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2001 Feb;4(1):35-43 PMID 11255494
Cites: Br J Nutr. 2012 May;107(10):1526-33 PMID 21929833
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):402-409.e5 PMID 19362694
Cites: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Aug;58(8):1174-80 PMID 15054431
Cites: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;23(5):446-53 PMID 19689495
Cites: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 May;58(5):771-7 PMID 15116080
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2009 Nov;12(11):2174-82 PMID 19402946
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):61-73 PMID 18596274
Cites: Br J Nutr. 2006 Nov;96(5):913-20 PMID 17092382
Cites: Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Oct;80(4):1029-35 PMID 15447916
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2016 May;19(7):1155-63 PMID 26228526
Cites: BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 24;14:75 PMID 24456804
Cites: BMC Womens Health. 2011 Aug 08;11:37 PMID 21819627
Cites: J Nutr. 2001 Apr;131(4):1217-24 PMID 11285330
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2008 Feb;11(2):176-82 PMID 17610760
Cites: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;205(4):337.e1-12 PMID 21855845
Cites: BJOG. 2017 Jan;124(1):97-109 PMID 26768233
Cites: BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 05;15:1012 PMID 26437719
Cites: J Nutr. 2002 Mar;132(3):461-71 PMID 11880572
Cites: J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 Sep-Oct;47(5):421-6.e1 PMID 26055973
Cites: Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;29(10 ):753-65 PMID 25193741
Cites: Matern Child Nutr. 2011 Apr;7(2):109-11 PMID 21332940
Cites: BJOG. 2010 Dec;117(13):1599-607 PMID 21078055
Cites: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;70(2):237-42 PMID 26350393
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jun;13(6A):939-46 PMID 20513264
Cites: BJOG. 2009 Feb;116(3):408-15 PMID 19187373
Cites: Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug;100(2):676-83 PMID 24944056
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jan;16(1):156-63 PMID 22583693
Cites: J Nutr. 2005 Apr;135(4):900-4 PMID 15795456
PubMed ID
28376732 View in PubMed
Less detail