Skip header and navigation

1 records – page 1 of 1.

Implementing a free school-based fruit and vegetable programme: barriers and facilitators experienced by pupils, teachers and produce suppliers in the Boost study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature266118
Source
BMC Public Health. 2014;14:146
Publication Type
Article
Date
2014
Author
Anne Kristine Aarestrup
Rikke Krølner
Thea Suldrup Jørgensen
Alexandra Evans
Pernille Due
Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
Source
BMC Public Health. 2014;14:146
Date
2014
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adolescent
Denmark
Faculty
Female
Focus Groups
Food Habits - psychology
Food Services - organization & administration
Fruit
Health Promotion - methods
Humans
Male
Qualitative Research
School Health Services - organization & administration
Students
Vegetables
Abstract
Multi-component interventions which combine educational and environmental strategies appear to be most effective in increasing fruit and vegetable (FV) intake in adolescents. However, multi-component interventions are complex to implement and often poorly implemented. Identification of barriers and facilitators for implementation is warranted to improve future interventions.This study aimed to explore implementation of two intervention components which addressed availability and accessibility of FV in the multi-component, school-based Boost study which targeted FV intake among Danish 13-year-olds and to identify barriers and facilitators for implementation among pupils, teachers and FV suppliers.
We conducted focus group interviews with 111 13-year-olds and 13 teachers, completed class observations at six schools, and conducted telephone interviews with all involved FV suppliers. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed using qualitative analytical procedures.
FV suppliers affected the implementation of the FV programme at schools and thereby pupils' intake through their timing of delivery and through the quality, quantity and variety of the delivered FV. Teachers influenced the accessibility and appearance of FV by deciding if and when the pupils could eat FV and whether FV were cut up. Different aspects of time acted as barriers for teachers' implementation of the FV programme: time spent on having a FV break during lessons, time needed to prepare FV and time spent on pupils' misbehaviour and not being able to handle getting FV. Teacher timing of cutting up and serving FV could turn into a barrier for pupils FV intake due to enzymatic browning. The appearance of FV was important for pupils' intake, especially for girls. FV that did not appeal to the pupils e.g. had turned brown after being cut up were thrown around as a part of a game by the pupils, especially boys. Girls appreciated the social dimension of eating FV together to a larger extent than boys.
Limited time and pupils' misbehaviour were barriers for teachers' implementation. Establishing FV delivery to schools as a new routine challenged FV suppliers' implementation. Food aesthetics were important for most pupils' FV intake while the social dimension of eating FV together seemed more important to girls than boys.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11666034.
Notes
Cites: Implement Sci. 2011;6:5321619645
Cites: J Sch Health. 2011 Apr;81(4):202-1121392012
Cites: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:11221999291
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2012 Mar;15(3):459-6521835081
Cites: BMC Public Health. 2012;12:19122413782
Cites: J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Mar;45(2):126-3623321021
Cites: Health Educ Behav. 2000 Apr;27(2):157-6610768797
Cites: Health Educ Res. 2002 Feb;17(1):59-7211888044
Cites: J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3 Suppl):S52-6311902389
Cites: Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):237-5612729182
Cites: Prev Med. 2003 Dec;37(6 Pt 1):593-61014636793
Cites: Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):270-8715090126
Cites: J Community Health. 2004 Oct;29(5):421-3515471423
Cites: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Nov 3;96(21):1577-8415523086
Cites: Prev Med. 2006 Feb;42(2):85-9516375956
Cites: BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-616484270
Cites: J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Sep;106(9):1364-816963341
Cites: Public Health Nutr. 2007 Sep;10(9):939-4717381944
Cites: J Sch Health. 2008 May;78(5):264-7318387026
Cites: Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-5018322790
Cites: Health Educ Res. 2008 Dec;23(6):997-100718156147
Cites: BMJ. 2009;339:b349619744976
Cites: Appetite. 2010 Jun;54(3):599-60220176066
Cites: J Pediatr Health Care. 2005 Mar-Apr;19(2):104-1015750555
Cites: Ann Nutr Metab. 2005 Jul-Aug;49(4):212-2016088084
Cites: Ann Nutr Metab. 2005 Jul-Aug;49(4):236-4516088087
Cites: Ann Nutr Metab. 2005 Jul-Aug;49(4):267-7716088090
Cites: Br J Nutr. 2005 Sep;94(3):423-3116176614
Cites: J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005 Dec;18(6):431-4316351702
Cites: Scand J Public Health. 2010 Nov;38(5 Suppl):38-5121062838
Cites: Can J Diet Pract Res. 2011 Spring;72(1):14-2221382226
Cites: Health Educ Res. 2011 Aug;26(4):722-3121571836
PubMed ID
24512278 View in PubMed
Less detail