Skip header and navigation

Refine By

2 records – page 1 of 1.

[When medical records are the best witness].

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature157778
Source
Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Mar 31;170(14):1143-5
Publication Type
Article
Date
Mar-31-2008
Author
Synne Søndergaard
Author Affiliation
Personaleafdelingen, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 København Ø. synne.soendergaard@rh.regionh.dk
Source
Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Mar 31;170(14):1143-5
Date
Mar-31-2008
Language
Danish
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Access to Information - legislation & jurisprudence
Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence
Denmark
Forensic Medicine - legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Insurance Claim Review - legislation & jurisprudence
Medical Records - legislation & jurisprudence
Wounds and Injuries - diagnosis - etiology
Abstract
This article looks at the development in the increasing use of medical records in the Danish Courts as well as outside the courts in cases of personal injury. The Danish Supreme Court puts the presence of all material above the protection of the confidential relationship between doctor and patient. It is not yet clear to what extent the use of medical records will be accepted. This development raises questions regarding legal security for patients and sets higher requirements for medical and legal personnel. Medical records give important testimony in cases regarding personal injury. It is therefore important for medical personnel to be aware of the content of the medical record, as it might be used and interpreted in the courtroom in a different manner than intended.
PubMed ID
18405477 View in PubMed
Less detail

Unlocking Health Canada's cache of trade secrets: mandatory disclosure of clinical trial results.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature131803
Source
CMAJ. 2012 Feb 7;184(2):194-9
Publication Type
Article
Date
Feb-7-2012
Author
Matthew Herder
Author Affiliation
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS. Matthew.Herder@Dal.ca
Source
CMAJ. 2012 Feb 7;184(2):194-9
Date
Feb-7-2012
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Access to Information - legislation & jurisprudence
Canada
Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence
Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence
Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence
Government Agencies - legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Mandatory Programs - legislation & jurisprudence
Off-Label Use - legislation & jurisprudence
Prescription Drugs - adverse effects
Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence
Registries
Notes
Cites: CMAJ. 2004 Feb 17;170(4):487-914970096
Cites: Lancet. 2004 Apr 24;363(9418):1341-515110490
Cites: CMAJ. 2004 May 25;170(11):1678-8615159366
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 2004 Sep 21;141(6):477-815355883
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1707-915470193
Cites: CMAJ. 2011 Jul 12;183(10):1125-621502342
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 17;358(3):252-6018199864
Cites: CMAJ. 2008 Feb 12;178(4):428-3118268270
Cites: Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jun;24(6):1683-918462565
Cites: PLoS Med. 2008 Nov 25;5(11):e217; discussion e21719067477
Cites: BMJ. 2011;342:d257021511787
Cites: BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):956-815845980
PubMed ID
21876028 View in PubMed
Less detail