Skip header and navigation

Refine By

2 records – page 1 of 1.

Quality of life following hip fractures: results from the Norwegian hip fracture register.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature287375
Source
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 07;17:265
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jul-07-2016
Author
Jan-Erik Gjertsen
Valborg Baste
Jonas M Fevang
Ove Furnes
Lars Birger Engesæter
Source
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 07;17:265
Date
Jul-07-2016
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects - statistics & numerical data
Female
Femoral Neck Fractures - complications - epidemiology - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects - instrumentation - statistics & numerical data
Hemiarthroplasty - adverse effects - statistics & numerical data
Hip Fractures - complications - epidemiology - surgery
Humans
Male
Norway - epidemiology
Pain - epidemiology - etiology
Pain Measurement
Postoperative Period
Preoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Registries - statistics & numerical data
Reoperation - adverse effects - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
Patient-reported health-related quality of life is an important outcome measure when assessing the quality of hip fracture surgery. The frequently used EQ-5D index score has unfortunately important limitations. One alternative can be to assess the distribution of each of the five dimensions of the patients' descriptive health profile. The objective of this paper was to investigate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after hip fractures.
Data from hip fracture operations from 2005 through 2012 were obtained from The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register. Patient reported HRQoL, (EQ-5D-3L) was collected from patients preoperatively and at four and twelve months postoperatively n?=?10325. At each follow-up the distribution of the EQ-5D-3L and mean pain VAS was calculated.
Generally, a higher proportion of patients reported problems in all 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-3L at all follow-ups compared to preoperative. Also a high proportion of patients with no preoperative problems reported problems after surgery; At 4 and 12 months follow-ups 71 % and 58 % of the patients reported walking problems, and 65 % and 59 % of the patients reported pain respectively. Patients with femoral neck fractures and the youngest patients (age?
Notes
Cites: Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1135-4023508867
Cites: Injury. 2008 Oct;39(10):1147-5618656868
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Aug;86(6):801-815330018
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Feb;91(2):210-619190056
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Nov;84(8):1150-512463661
Cites: BMJ. 2007 Dec 15;335(7632):1251-418056740
Cites: Int Orthop. 2011 Nov;35(11):1703-1121301830
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):249-6016452734
Cites: Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-7210158943
Cites: Qual Life Res. 1998 Jan;7(1):1-109481146
Cites: J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sep;23(6):843-918534515
Cites: Injury. 2013 Jun;44(6):735-4223305689
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 18;95(18):1693-924048557
Cites: Acta Orthop. 2010 Oct;81(5):588-9220860442
Cites: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2426-3519130162
Cites: Injury. 2000 Dec;31(10):793-711154750
Cites: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3482-823897504
Cites: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Aug;(425):64-7115292789
Cites: Acta Orthop. 2008 Oct;79(5):583-9318839363
Cites: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):360-723975250
Cites: Qual Life Res. 2009 Nov;18(9):1177-8419714486
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):619-2820194320
Cites: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3409-1123934032
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83-A(8):1149-5611507122
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Apr;87(4):523-915795204
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1113-922844055
Cites: Acta Orthop. 2006 Aug;77(4):638-4316929442
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1680-816085605
Cites: Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):1069-7914651424
Cites: Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):268-7421619501
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):867-7521705555
Cites: Osteoporos Int. 2004 Jul;15(7):567-7414730422
Cites: Qual Life Res. 2007 Mar;16(2):321-3017033908
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Apr;85(3):380-812729114
Cites: Qual Life Res. 2002 Aug;11(5):473-8112113394
Cites: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Apr;471(4):1379-8623224796
Cites: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar;84(2):183-811922358
Cites: Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Feb;74(1):42-412635791
PubMed ID
27387741 View in PubMed
Less detail

Registration rate in the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Register: large-volume hospitals perform better.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature125364
Source
Acta Orthop. 2012 Apr;83(2):174-8
Publication Type
Article
Date
Apr-2012
Author
Karianne Ytterstad
Lars-Petter Granan
Børge Ytterstad
Kjersti Steindal
Knut Andreas Fjeldsgaard
Ove Furnes
Lars Engebretsen
Author Affiliation
The Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. karianne.ytterstad@medisin.uio.no
Source
Acta Orthop. 2012 Apr;83(2):174-8
Date
Apr-2012
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery
Arthroscopy - classification - methods - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Private - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Public - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Knee Injuries - epidemiology - surgery
Norway - epidemiology
Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards - statistics & numerical data
Registries - standards - statistics & numerical data
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
The Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Register (NCLR) was founded in 2004. The purpose of the NCLR is to provide representative and reliable data for future research. In this study we evaluated the development of the registration rate in the NCLR.
The Norwegian Patient Register (NPR) and the electronic patient charts (EPCs) were used as reference data for public and private hospitals, respectively. Data were retrieved for all primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery during 2008-2009 in public hospitals and during 2008 in private hospitals. The NOMESCO classification of surgical procedures was used for identification of ACL surgeries. Public hospitals were divided into subgroups according to the annual number of operations in the NPR: small hospitals (
Notes
Cites: Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Oct;72(5):433-4111728068
Cites: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Apr 1;124(7):928-3015060639
Cites: Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Aug;75(4):434-4115370588
Cites: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-969699158
Cites: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2011 Feb 4;131(3):248-5021304574
Cites: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Nov 3;125(21):2973-416276384
Cites: Acta Orthop. 2005 Dec;76(6):823-816470436
Cites: Acta Orthop. 2006 Feb;77(1):49-5616534702
Cites: Am J Sports Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):308-1517989167
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):280-515718117
PubMed ID
22489890 View in PubMed
Less detail