Skip header and navigation

Refine By

2 records – page 1 of 1.

Five-year clinical follow-up of a randomized comparison of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent versus a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus (LIPSIA Yukon trial).

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature257165
Source
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb 15;83(3):418-24
Publication Type
Article
Date
Feb-15-2014
Author
Thomas Stiermaier
Anja Heinz
Denis Schloma
Klaus Kleinertz
Wilfried Dänschel
Sandra Erbs
Axel Linke
Enno Boudriot
Bernward Lauer
Gerhard Schuler
Holger Thiele
Steffen Desch
Author Affiliation
Department of Internal Medicine - Cardiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Source
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb 15;83(3):418-24
Date
Feb-15-2014
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Cardiovascular Agents - administration & dosage
Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis - mortality - therapy
Coronary Thrombosis - etiology
Diabetic Angiopathies - diagnosis - mortality - therapy
Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Germany
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - etiology
Paclitaxel - administration & dosage
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects - instrumentation - mortality
Polymers - chemistry
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Risk factors
Sirolimus - administration & dosage
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
The long-term performance of polymer-free stent systems in patients with diabetes mellitus has not been investigated extensively. This study reports long-term results of the LIPSIA Yukon trial which compared the polymer-free sirolimus-eluting Yukon Choice stent with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberté stent in this subpopulation. At 9 months, the Yukon Choice stent failed to show non-inferiority in terms of the primary end point late lumen loss, while no significant difference in clinical outcome was detected.
The LIPSIA Yukon trial randomized 240 patients with diabetes mellitus to a polymer-free sirolimus eluting stent (Yukon Choice, Translumina) versus a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus Liberté, Boston Scientific). Clinical follow-up was conducted with a standardized telephone follow-up and all events were centrally adjudicated. Follow-up was available for 98.3% of patients after a median of 5.0 years. The incidence of all-cause death (16.9% versus 14.0%, P?=?0.67), respectively definite or presumed cardiovascular death (7.6% versus 8.8%, P?=?0.94) were similar in the Yukon Choice and the Taxus Liberté group. There were no significant differences in the rates of myocardial infarction (9.3% versus 7.9%, P?=?0.88), definite stent thrombosis (0.8% versus 0.9%, P?=?1.0), target lesion revascularization (15.3% versus 15.8%, P?=?1.0), target vessel revascularization (18.6% versus 23.7%, P?=?0.44), non-target vessel revascularization (18.6% versus 26.3%, P?=?0.21), and stroke (3.4% versus 4.4%, P?=?0.96) between patients assigned to the Yukon Choice and the Taxus Liberté stent.
At 5 years of follow-up, clinical outcome was similar between the polymer-free sirolimus-eluting Yukon Choice stent and the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberté stent.
Notes
Comment In: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb 15;83(3):425-624497456
PubMed ID
23873579 View in PubMed
Less detail

Randomized comparison of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent versus a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: the LIPSIA Yukon trial.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature135082
Source
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr;4(4):452-9
Publication Type
Article
Date
Apr-2011
Author
Steffen Desch
Denis Schloma
Sven Möbius-Winkler
Sandra Erbs
Stephan Gielen
Axel Linke
Jiangtao Yu
Bernward Lauer
Klaus Kleinertz
Wilfried Dänschel
Gerhard Schuler
Holger Thiele
Author Affiliation
Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig, Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany. stdesch@web.de
Source
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr;4(4):452-9
Date
Apr-2011
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects - instrumentation - mortality
Cardiovascular Agents - administration & dosage
Chi-Square Distribution
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Restenosis - etiology
Coronary Stenosis - radiography - therapy
Diabetes mellitus
Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Germany
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - etiology
Paclitaxel - administration & dosage
Polymers
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Sirolimus - administration & dosage
Thrombosis - etiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
The objective of the study was to assess noninferiority of the polymer-free sirolimus-eluting Yukon Choice stent (Translumina GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) compared with the polymer-based Taxus Liberté stent (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) with regard to the primary endpoint, in-stent late lumen loss, at 9 months in patients with diabetes mellitus.
The Yukon Choice stent has been evaluated in several randomized controlled trials before, albeit to date, there has been no trial that exclusively enrolled patients with diabetes mellitus.
Patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for clinically significant de novo coronary artery stenosis were randomized 1:1 to receive either the polymer-free sirolimus-eluting Yukon Choice stent or the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberté stent.
A total of 240 patients were randomized. Quantitative coronary angiography was available for 79% of patients. Mean in-stent late lumen loss was 0.63 ± 0.62 mm for the Yukon Choice stent and 0.45 ± 0.60 mm for the Taxus Liberté stent. Based on the pre-specified margin, the Yukon Choice stent failed to show noninferiority for the primary endpoint. During follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups regarding death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, or nontarget vessel revascularization.
Compared with the Taxus Liberté stent, the polymer-free sirolimus-eluting Yukon Choice stent failed to show noninferiority with regard to the primary endpoint, in-stent late lumen loss, in patients with diabetes mellitus after 9-month follow-up. Both stents showed comparable clinical efficacy and safety. (Yukon Choice Versus Taxus Liberté in Diabetes Mellitus; NCT00368953).
PubMed ID
21511226 View in PubMed
Less detail