Skip header and navigation

Refine By

96 records – page 1 of 10.

Article in Canadian physics journal put academic integrity on trial.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature221046
Source
CMAJ. 1993 May 15;148(10):1771-3
Publication Type
Article
Date
May-15-1993
Author
P. Huston
Source
CMAJ. 1993 May 15;148(10):1771-3
Date
May-15-1993
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Canada
Female
Humans
Prejudice
Publishing
Scientific Misconduct
Women, Working
Notes
Comment In: CMAJ. 1993 Oct 1;149(7):923; author reply 923-48402412
Comment In: CMAJ. 1993 Oct 1;149(7):923; author reply 923-48402411
PubMed ID
8485680 View in PubMed
Less detail

Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature274173
Source
BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:53
Publication Type
Article
Date
2014
Author
Magne Nylenna
Frode Fagerbakk
Peter Kierulf
Source
BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:53
Date
2014
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Authorship
Biomedical research
Editorial Policies
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Hospitals, University
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Norway
Publishing - ethics
Research Personnel
Schools, Medical
Scientific Misconduct
Surveys and Questionnaires
Abstract
Attitudes to, and practices of, scientific authorship vary. We have studied this variation among researchers in a university hospital and medical school in Norway.
We invited all faculty, researchers and PhD students at Oslo University Hospital and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo (approximately 2700) by e-mail to answer a web-based questionnaire in January 2013. We asked the researchers to report their authorship experiences and to score their agreement with, and ability to practice according to, 13 statements on authorship qualifications and criteria on a five-point Likert scale (1?=?completely agree, 5?=?completely disagree). The statements were taken from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and other recommendations on authorship.
654 questionnaires were returned (response rate 24%); 25% of the respondents had published less than five scientific articles, 43% five to 49, and 32% more than 50 articles. 97% reported knowledge of defined authorship criteria, and 68% regarded breaches of these as scientific misconduct. 36% had experienced pressure to include undeserved authors in their papers, more in basic science (46%) than in community medicine (25%). 29% reported that they had been denied authorship they believed they deserved. Researchers with less than six years of research experience found authorship decisions more difficult than more experienced researchers (48% vs 30%).The respondents' agreement with the statements on authorship was higher than their self-reported ability to follow them for all statements. Average scores for agreement and practice for all statements combined were 1.4 vs 2.3. The discrepancy between attitude and practice declined with publishing experience. For the core ICMJE authorship requirements the average difference between attitude and practice was 1.2 among those who had published less than 5 articles and 0.7 among those who had published 50 articles or more (p?
Notes
Cites: BMJ. 1997 Apr 5;314(7086):1009-129112845
Cites: JAMA. 1997 Aug 20;278(7):579-859268280
Cites: Lancet. 1999 Jul 3;354(9172):57-6110406378
Cites: J Med Ethics. 2005 Oct;31(10):578-8116199598
Cites: MedGenMed. 2006;8(4):5217415332
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 2007 Dec 4;147(11):795-80218056665
Cites: Maturitas. 2009 Feb 20;62(2):109-1219147308
Cites: Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):341-5421533836
Cites: Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):335-921611821
Cites: PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e2347721931600
Cites: BMJ. 2011;343:d612822028479
Cites: Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Jun;18(2):199-21221312000
Cites: BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14:323289954
Cites: Rheumatol Int. 2013 Feb;33(2):277-8423124697
Cites: Acad Med. 2013 Mar;88(3):364-823348080
Cites: Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):641-5122382923
Cites: J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):509-1222865926
Cites: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug;132(2):303e-310e23897358
PubMed ID
24989359 View in PubMed
Less detail
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jan;21(1):21
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jan-2005
Author
Paul Malik
Author Affiliation
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. pgmalik@hotmail.com
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jan;21(1):21
Date
Jan-2005
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Biotechnology
Canada
Drug Industry - trends
Fraud
Humans
Internet
Ownership - legislation & jurisprudence
Risk assessment
Scientific Misconduct
PubMed ID
15685297 View in PubMed
Less detail

The breast cancer research scandal: addressing the issues.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature215351
Source
CMAJ. 1995 Apr 15;152(8):1195-7
Publication Type
Article
Date
Apr-15-1995
Author
C. Weijer
Source
CMAJ. 1995 Apr 15;152(8):1195-7
Date
Apr-15-1995
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Bias (epidemiology)
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Ethics, Medical
Female
History, 20th Century
Humans
Morals
Patient Selection
Quebec
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods - standards
Reproducibility of Results
Scientific Misconduct
United States
Abstract
The three claims put forward by Dr. Roger Poisson to rationalize his enrollment of ineligible subjects in clinical trials do not justify research fraud. None the less, certain lessons for the conduct of clinical research can be learned from the affair: experimental therapies should be made available to technically ineligible subjects when no effective therapy exists for their disease; further research must investigate the possible benefits of clinical-trial participation; broadly based, pragmatic trials must be regarded as the ideal model; and each eligibility criterion in a clinical-trial protocol should be justified.
Notes
Cites: Cancer. 1985 Nov 1;56(9):2161-93902204
Cites: Cancer Invest. 1983;1(1):49-556582988
Cites: Science. 1981 Feb 27;211(4485):881-66781066
Cites: Br Med J. 1979 Sep 8;2(6190):567-9227525
Cites: Br J Cancer. 1976 Dec;34(6):585-612795448
Cites: IRB. 1994 Jan-Apr;16(1-2):1-611652320
Cites: Acta Chir Belg. 1990 May-Jun;90(3):129-312375213
Cites: CMAJ. 1994 Sep 15;151(6):835-78087758
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 1994 Sep 15;121(6):463-48053622
Cites: Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Apr;17(2):16-93294742
Cites: Br J Haematol. 1992 Jan;80(1):55-611536810
Cites: N Engl J Med. 1994 May 19;330(20):1448-508159201
Cites: BMJ. 1989 Oct 28;299(6707):1069-722511967
Cites: CMAJ. 1990 May 15;142(10):1057-622186850
Cites: Stat Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;9(1-2):73-83; discussion 83-62345840
Cites: BMJ. 1989 Oct 28;299(6707):1058-92511962
Cites: Arch Dis Child. 1989 May;64(5):657-612730119
Cites: J Clin Oncol. 1987 Jun;5(6):962-83585451
PubMed ID
7736369 View in PubMed
Less detail

Cancer study was made up, journal says.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature16513
Source
NY Times (Print). 2006 Jan 19;:A16
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jan-19-2006

96 records – page 1 of 10.