Skip header and navigation

Refine By

24 records – page 1 of 3.

Source
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 28;165(18):1893-4
Publication Type
Article
Date
Apr-28-2003
Author
Jørgen Hilden
Author Affiliation
j.hilden@biostat.ku.dk
Source
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 28;165(18):1893-4
Date
Apr-28-2003
Language
Danish
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Denmark
Humans
Periodicals as Topic - standards
Publishing - standards
PubMed ID
12772403 View in PubMed
Less detail

[Clinical trials in Norway--completion and reporting are not satisfactory].

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature177369
Source
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Nov 18;124(22):2888-90
Publication Type
Article
Date
Nov-18-2004
Author
Linda Sandaker
Bente Fjeld
Asmund Reikvam
Harald Lislevand
Steinar Madsen
Author Affiliation
Institutt for farmakoterapi, Det medisinske fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo, Postboks 1065 Blindern ,0316 Oslo.
Source
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Nov 18;124(22):2888-90
Date
Nov-18-2004
Language
Norwegian
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Clinical Trials as Topic - economics - standards - statistics & numerical data
Drug Industry - economics
Humans
Multicenter Studies as Topic - economics - standards - statistics & numerical data
Norway
Publishing - standards - statistics & numerical data
Research Support as Topic - economics
Abstract
To investigate how drug trials are carried out and reported in Norway and to what extent they are published.
All drug trials notified in 1996 were included in the study. Data were obtained from the standard notification form, correspondence with investigators, end-of-study reports, and a questionnaire designed for this study.
A total of 208 drug trials were notified. Most trials were initiated by the pharmaceutical industry (85%) and international multicenter studies constituted a major part (73%). Mandatory end-of-study reports were submitted to the health authorities on 48 (23%) of the trials. Out of a total of 159 trials for which we have data, 39 (25%) were interrupted or not started. Out of a total of 143 trials for which we have data on publishing, 77 (54%) were not published. Trials with a positive conclusion (54%) were more likely to be published than those with a negative conclusion (38%).
The reporting of drug trials is not satisfactory. Because of low reporting frequency, health authorities do not obtain a comprehensive overview. The pharmaceutical industry initiates the majority of the trials and clinical researchers in Norway increasingly participate in international multicentre trials. Many trials are not carried out as planned; less than half are published.
PubMed ID
15550958 View in PubMed
Less detail

[Common shortcomings and mistakes in monographs and textbooks on industrial ecology].

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature205924
Source
Med Tr Prom Ekol. 1998;(2):36
Publication Type
Article
Date
1998

Culpable negligence: a case for the courts?

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature40006
Source
N Y State J Med. 1983 Dec;83(13):1282-3
Publication Type
Article
Date
Dec-1983

[Estimation of the place of the Russian Federation in the world publication activity ranking on priority trends in biomedicine].

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature301310
Source
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2019; (5):120-127
Publication Type
Journal Article
Date
2019
Author
V I Starodubov
F A Kurakov
L A Tsvetkova
Yu V Polyakova
Author Affiliation
Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics of Ministry of Health of the Russia, Moscow, Russia; Center for Scientific and Technical Expertise, Institute of Applied Economic Research, The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia.
Source
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2019; (5):120-127
Date
2019
Language
Russian
Publication Type
Journal Article
Keywords
Biomedical Research - standards - statistics & numerical data
Biomedical Technology - standards - statistics & numerical data
Databases, Factual - statistics & numerical data
Internationality
Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence - trends
Publishing - standards - statistics & numerical data
Russia
Abstract
During 2012-2018 in the Russian Federation, pursuant to Presidential Decree No. 599 of 05.07.2012, a set of state support measures was implemented aimed at increasing the specific gravity of Russian publications indexed in international databases. The national project 'Science' (NPS) designed to realize the goals set by Presidential Decree No.204 of 05.07.2018 'On the National Goals and Strategic Tasks for Development of the Russian Federation until 2024' continues and develops the theme of increasing the publication activity of the Russian Federation in the internationalized space. One of the six NPS targets is 'The place of the Russian Federation in terms of specific gravity in the total number of articles in areas defined by the priorities of scientific and technological development in publications indexed in international databases'. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the basic value of this indicator for biomedical disciplines related to the priority direction (paragraph 20c) of the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation. We compared volumes of publication flows of the Russian Federation in 20 biomedical disciplines with a similar indicator of countries ranked fifth in the number of publications on the subject area under consideration, indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC). A 5-10 fold lag of the Russian Federation was recorded for the most part of the priority areas in the field of biomedicine identified by the NTS passport. The impact of public policy measures aimed at increasing the national biomedical publication stream for the period of 2012-2018 was estimated as insufficient to meet the considered NTS target.
? ??????? 2012-2018 ??. ? ?????????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ????? ?????????? #599 ?? 07.05.12 ??? ?????????? ???????? ??? ??????????????? ?????????, ???????????? ?? ?????????? ????????? ???? ?????????? ??????????, ????????????? ? ????????????? ????? ??????. ???????????? ?????? '?????' (???), ?????????? ??????????? ????, ???????????? ?????? ?????????? #204 ?? 07.05.18 '? ???????????? ????? ? ?????????????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ????????? ?? ?????? ?? 2024 ????', ?????????? ? ????????? ???? ?????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ?? ? ???????????????????????? ????????????. ????? ?? ????? ??????? ??????????? ??? ???????? '????? ?????????? ????????? ?? ????????? ???? ? ????? ????? ?????? ? ????????, ???????????? ???????????? ??????-???????????????? ???????? ? ????????, ????????????? ? ????????????? ????? ??????'. ???? ???????????? - ?????? ???????? ???????? ????? ?????????? ??? ?????????????? ?????????, ?????????? ? ????????????? ??????????? 20-? ????????? ??????-???????????????? ???????? ??. ???????????? ?????? ?????????????? ??????? ?????????? ????????? ?? 20 ?????????????? ??????????? ? ??????????? ??????????? ?????, ?????????? 5-? ????? ?? ????? ?????????? ? ??????????????? ?????????? ???????, ????????????? ? Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC). ????????????? 5-10-??????? ?????????? ?????????? ????????? ?? ??????? ????? ?????????? ????????? ??? ???????????? ??????????? ? ??????? ???????????. ???????????????? ??? ??????????????? ????????, ???????????? ?? ?????????? ?????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ?? ?????? 2012-2018 ??., ??????? ??? ????????????? ??? ?????????? ???????????????? ???????? ?????????? ???.
PubMed ID
31169829 View in PubMed
Less detail

Gastroenterology in the last decennia and initiatives in medical ethics: coincidence or linkage?

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature72965
Source
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996;216:208-17
Publication Type
Article
Date
1996
Author
O O Thomsen
P. Riis
Author Affiliation
Dept. of Medical Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Source
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996;216:208-17
Date
1996
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Attitude of Health Personnel
Biomedical research
Data Collection
Denmark
Ethics, Medical - history
Europe
Female
Gastroenterology - history
History, 20th Century
Humans
Male
Physician-Patient Relations
Publishing - standards
Scientific Misconduct
Truth Disclosure
Abstract
A quarter of a century ago ethics was an esoteric term, known to theologians and philosophers, but unknown as a discipline to the majority of doctors. Since then, however, ethics has become a substantial part of clinical medicine and health research. Ethics as an area of interest for Danish gastroenterologists appeared from several foci in the early days. One angle was an almost revival-like interest in research methodology and its ethical dimensions. Other angles were derived from Danish gastroenterologists' experiences transferred from other disciplines before the birth of Danish gastroenterology. From the time of these early incentives Danish gastroenterologists have constituted a platform for the implementation of the basic principles, lying behind medical ethics, now in collaboration with other parts of the medical profession. The topics are reflected in a number of publications and in the various practical diversions. An interest in information of patients appeared at an early stage. Publication ethics as a subdiscipline involved Danish gastroenterologists and has led to contributions within the framework of the International Group of Medical Journal Editors. Research ethics, a central topic throughout all years, has led to such important initiatives as the Second Helsinki Declaration and the establishment of a national control system for medical research in man. A further ramification of ethics is scientific dishonesty and good clinical practice. Here a recent initiative has led to the establishment of a national Committee on Scientific Dishonesty. Under the auspices of the OMGE (Organisation Mondiale de Gastroentérologie) Danish gastroenterologists have investigated transnational and transcultural differences in gastroenterologists' attitudes to information of patients and relatives and have unmasked considerable and important differences throughout the world. Medical ethics has, together with scientific methodology, to some extent reunited the sub-specialized fragments of the mother disciplines medicine and surgery and in this way has acted as partes pro toto.
PubMed ID
8726293 View in PubMed
Less detail

I.V. therapy guidelines now in second printing.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature241947
Source
Dimens Health Serv. 1983 May;60(5):14-5
Publication Type
Article
Date
May-1983
Author
R. Siulys
Source
Dimens Health Serv. 1983 May;60(5):14-5
Date
May-1983
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Canada
Education, Nursing - standards
Humans
Injections, Intravenous - standards
Nursing Care - standards
Publishing - standards
PubMed ID
6862120 View in PubMed
Less detail

[More stringent requirements concerning manuscripts. Declarations of potential connections and conflicts of interest published in the Lakartidningen].

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature190105
Source
Lakartidningen. 2002 Apr 11;99(15):1662-3
Publication Type
Article
Date
Apr-11-2002
Author
Josef Milerad
Jon Ahlberg
Mats Eliasson
Barbro Fridén
Anders Håkansson
Carl Johan Sundberg
Hans Agren
Jan Ostergren
Author Affiliation
josef.milerad@lakartidningen.se
Source
Lakartidningen. 2002 Apr 11;99(15):1662-3
Date
Apr-11-2002
Language
Swedish
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Authorship
Clinical Trials as Topic - economics - standards
Conflict of Interest
Contract Services
Disclosure
Drug Industry - economics
Humans
Manuscripts as Topic
Peer Review, Research - standards
Publishing - standards
Research Support as Topic
Sweden
Notes
Comment In: Lakartidningen. 2002 Jul 25;99(30-31):3106-812198928
Comment In: Lakartidningen. 2003 Jan 23;100(4):252-312580015
PubMed ID
12025190 View in PubMed
Less detail

Moving toward policy development on assigning publication credit for oncology nurses' contributions to scholarly and scientific work.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature205040
Source
Can Oncol Nurs J. 1998 May;8(2):108-20
Publication Type
Article
Date
May-1998
Author
D. Ginn
L J Butler
Author Affiliation
Faculty of Law at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Source
Can Oncol Nurs J. 1998 May;8(2):108-20
Date
May-1998
Language
English
French
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Attitude of Health Personnel
Authorship
Canada
Cooperative Behavior
Copyright - legislation & jurisprudence
Ethics, Nursing
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Nurses - psychology
Nursing Research
Oncology Nursing
Plagiarism
Publishing - standards
Questionnaires
Abstract
The policy implications of a 1996 national nursing survey on the allocation of publication credit form of this paper. An earlier article (Butler & Ginn, 1997) describes and analyzes the outcome of the survey; the purpose here is to draw on that analysis, and on the relevant literature, to propose a starting place for discussion within the specialty of oncology and the nursing profession regarding assignment of credit for various contributions to collaborative scholarly work. After identifying the growing need for such a discussion and briefly highlighting the findings of the survey, the paper goes on to examine unacceptable practices in scholarly work and identify issues which should be resolved before collaborative work is undertaken. The final portion of the paper makes tentative suggestions as to principles and guidelines which might be applied to avoid disputes about the value of different contributions to a collaborative project. It is emphasized that the intention is not to advocate acceptance of the guidelines suggested here, but to create sufficient interest so that an approach to allocation of publication credit may be developed which will be consistent and relevant to the needs of the nursing profession.
PubMed ID
9677916 View in PubMed
Less detail

24 records – page 1 of 3.