Skip header and navigation

1 records – page 1 of 1.

Eighteen-month follow-up of infants fed evaporated milk formula.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature200834
Source
Can J Public Health. 1999 Jul-Aug;90(4):240-3
Publication Type
Article
Author
J K Friel
W L Andrews
C. Edgecombe
U R McCloy
S L Belkhode
M R L'Abbe
C N Mercer
A C McDonald
Author Affiliation
Memorial University of Newfoundland, Janeway Child Health Centre, St. John's. jfriel@morgan.ucs.mun.ca
Source
Can J Public Health. 1999 Jul-Aug;90(4):240-3
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Animals
Bottle Feeding - adverse effects
Child Nutrition Disorders - etiology
Deficiency Diseases - etiology
Energy intake
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Indians, North American
Infant
Infant Food - adverse effects
Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Milk - adverse effects
Newfoundland and Labrador
Nutrition Surveys
Nutritional Status
Abstract
In parts of Canada including Newfoundland and Labrador and among Aboriginal peoples, infants still consume evaporated milk (EM) formulas for cultural and economic reasons. At 3 and 6 months, full-term infants fed EM (n = 30) received low intakes of iron, thiamine, selenium and had higher weight velocity than breastfed (BF, n = 29) infants. EM infants had greater anemia, lowered transketolase activity (thiamine) and lowered glutathione peroxidase (selenium) activity (p
PubMed ID
10489720 View in PubMed
Less detail