Skip header and navigation

2 records – page 1 of 1.

Concurrent validity of the Swedish version of the life-space assessment questionnaire.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature282982
Source
BMC Geriatr. 2016 11 08;16(1):181
Publication Type
Article
Date
11-08-2016
Author
Sofi Fristedt
Ann-Sofi Kammerlind
Marie Ernsth Bravell
Eleonor I Fransson
Source
BMC Geriatr. 2016 11 08;16(1):181
Date
11-08-2016
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Architectural Accessibility - methods - standards
Female
Humans
Independent Living - standards
Male
Mobility Limitation
Reproducibility of Results
Social Support
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sweden - epidemiology
Translating
Abstract
The Life-Space Assessment (LSA), developed in the USA, is an instrument focusing on mobility with respect to reaching different areas defined as life-spaces, extending from the room where the person sleeps to mobility outside one's hometown. A newly translated Swedish version of the LSA (LSA-S) has been tested for test-retest reliability, but the validity remains to be tested. The purpose of the present study was to examine the concurrent validity of the LSA-S, by comparing and correlating the LSA scores to other measures of mobility.
The LSA was included in a population-based study of health, functioning and mobility among older persons in Sweden, and the present analysis comprised 312 community-dwelling participants. To test the concurrent validity, the LSA scores were compared to a number of other mobility-related variables, including the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) as well as "stair climbing", "transfers", "transportation", "food shopping", "travel for pleasure" and "community activities". The LSA total mean scores for different levels of the other mobility-related variables, and measures of correlation were calculated.
Higher LSA total mean scores were observed with higher levels of all the other mobility related variables. Most of the correlations between the LSA and the other mobility variables were large (r?=?0.5-1.0) and significant at the 0.01 level. The LSA total score, as well as independent life-space and assistive life-space correlated with transportation (0.63, 0.66, 0.64) and food shopping (0.55, 0.58, 0.55). Assistive life-space also correlated with SPPB (0.47). With respect to maximal life-space, the correlations with the mobility-related variables were generally lower (below 0.5), probably since this aspect of life-space mobility is highly influenced by social support and is not so dependent on the individual's own physical function.
LSA was shown to be a valid measure of mobility when using the LSA total, independent LS or assistive LSA.
Notes
Cites: J Aging Health. 2013 Sep;25(6):907-2023965310
Cites: Clin Rehabil. 2014 Feb 7;28(8):817-82324509893
Cites: Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Aug;25(4):e368-7326152855
Cites: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug;95(8):1527-3224742940
Cites: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jun;47(6):1121-724094702
Cites: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Nov;51(11):1610-414687391
Cites: Disabil Rehabil. 2001 Oct 15;23 (15):670-611720117
Cites: BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 22;12:101823170987
Cites: Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013 Oct;25(5):553-6023949973
Cites: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Feb;91(2):241-620159128
Cites: Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009 Jan;4(1):31-4119172479
Cites: Qual Life Res. 2006 Nov;15(9):1471-917009086
Cites: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):700-415817020
Cites: Phys Ther. 2005 Oct;85(10):1008-11916180950
Cites: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jul;60(7):1310-522702515
Cites: Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-338628042
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 2009 Mar 17;150(6):372-819293070
Cites: Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7(4):182-64093250
Cites: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Mar;60(3):532-722283683
Cites: J Aging Health. 2012 Aug;24(5):863-7822422762
Cites: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 09;52(10):7168-7421862652
Cites: Phys Ther. 2002 Feb;82(2):128-3711856064
PubMed ID
27821138 View in PubMed
Less detail

Do personal assistance activities promote participation for persons with disabilities in Sweden?

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature294940
Source
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 12; 39(24):2512-2521
Publication Type
Journal Article
Date
12-2017
Author
Heléne von Granitz
Ieva Reine
Karin Sonnander
Ulrika Winblad
Author Affiliation
a Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Source
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 12; 39(24):2512-2521
Date
12-2017
Language
English
Publication Type
Journal Article
Keywords
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Disabled Persons - psychology - rehabilitation - statistics & numerical data
Female
Healthcare Disparities
Human Rights - standards
Humans
Independent Living - standards
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Middle Aged
Needs Assessment
Public Policy
Social Participation
Social Security - standards
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sweden - epidemiology
Abstract
To examine how the right to participation according to Article 19 of the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) is promoted by personal assistance use in Sweden across age, gender and eligible person categories.
Register data and data from a questionnaire were used (N?=?15,289). Principal component analysis was performed and the internal consistency was tested. Descriptive statistics (?2 test) were used across age, gender and eligible person categories and components.
An uneven distribution of personal assistance across the components Health and Care; Home, Leisure and Social Interaction; and Daily Occupation was found. Significant differences in personal assistance reported were found between children and adults, men and women and between the three eligible person categories.
The discrepancy between reported and expected outcome of personal assistance indicates that Article 19 of the UNCRPD has not been met. The unequal access to participation across age, gender and eligible person categories would seem to further signify that the Act concerning Support and Service for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments is promoting activities of a caring nature rather than fulfilling Article 19 of the UNCRPD, i.e. ensuring full participation in society. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Government assistance allowance were granted for predominantly health and care, i.e. basic needs presenting risk of undermining the intention of participation in society. Men reported more personal assistance use for activities promoting participation than women. The discrepancy found between reported and expected outcome of personal assistance underlines the importance of service providers and administrative officials being sensitive to policy intentions. There is a need of guidelines for service providers and administrative officials to promote disability rights of participation for persons eligible for personal assistance.
PubMed ID
27796138 View in PubMed
Less detail