Skip header and navigation

1 records – page 1 of 1.

Randomised comparison of manual compression and FemoSeal™ vascular closure device for closure after femoral artery access coronary angiography: the CLOSure dEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature260687
Source
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):183-90
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jun-2014
Author
Niels R Holm
Birthe Sindberg
Mia Schou
Michael Maeng
Anne Kaltoft
Morten Bøttcher
Lars R Krusell
Jakob Hjort
Leif Thuesen
Christian J Terkelsen
Evald H Christiansen
Hans Erik Bøtker
Steen D Kristensen
Jens F Lassen
Source
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):183-90
Date
Jun-2014
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Chi-Square Distribution
Coronary Angiography - adverse effects - methods
Denmark
Equipment Design
Female
Femoral Artery
Hematoma - etiology - prevention & control
Hemorrhage - etiology - prevention & control
Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects - instrumentation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Pressure
Punctures
Risk factors
Sex Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Closure Devices
Abstract
To compare in a randomised trial the safety and efficacy of the FemoSeal vascular closure device (VCD) versus manual compression (MC) after femoral access coronary angiography (CAG).
In 13 months, 1,014 patients were included and 1,001 patients entered analysis. Median [interquartile range] closure time was 8.0 [6-10] minutes after MC versus 1.0 [1-1] minute (p
Notes
Comment In: EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):175-724952054
PubMed ID
24603054 View in PubMed
Less detail