Skip header and navigation

1 records – page 1 of 1.

Does individual learning styles influence the choice to use a web-based ECG learning programme in a blended learning setting?
BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:5
Publication Type
Mikael Nilsson
Jan Östergren
Uno Fors
Anette Rickenlund
Lennart Jorfeldt
Kenneth Caidahl
Gunilla Bolinder
Author Affiliation
Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:5
Publication Type
Cardiology - education
Choice Behavior
Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - organization & administration
Educational Measurement
Internet - utilization
Program Evaluation
Statistics, nonparametric
Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
The compressed curriculum in modern knowledge-intensive medicine demands useful tools to achieve approved learning aims in a limited space of time. Web-based learning can be used in different ways to enhance learning. Little is however known regarding its optimal utilisation. Our aim was to investigate if the individual learning styles of medical students influence the choice to use a web-based ECG learning programme in a blended learning setting.
The programme, with three types of modules (learning content, self-assessment questions and interactive ECG interpretation training), was offered on a voluntary basis during a face to face ECG learning course for undergraduate medical students. The Index of Learning Styles (ILS) and a general questionnaire including questions about computer and Internet usage, preferred future speciality and prior experience of E-learning were used to explore different factors related to the choice of using the programme or not.
93 (76%) out of 123 students answered the ILS instrument and 91 the general questionnaire. 55 students (59%) were defined as users of the web-based ECG-interpretation programme. Cronbach's alpha was analysed with coefficients above 0.7 in all of the four dimensions of ILS. There were no significant differences with regard to learning styles, as assessed by ILS, between the user and non-user groups; Active/Reflective; Visual/Verbal; Sensing/Intuitive; and Sequential/Global (p = 0.56-0.96). Neither did gender, prior experience of E-learning or preference for future speciality differ between groups.
Among medical students, neither learning styles according to ILS, nor a number of other characteristics seem to influence the choice to use a web-based ECG programme. This finding was consistent also when the usage of the different modules in the programme were considered. Thus, the findings suggest that web-based learning may attract a broad variety of medical students.
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):747-5012729430
Cites: South Med J. 1988 Oct;81(10):1291-43051432
Cites: Acad Med. 2005 Mar;80(3):266-7815734809
Cites: Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10 Suppl):S97-10116199469
Cites: Acad Med. 2006 Mar;81(3):231-816501263
Cites: BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:716451719
Cites: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:931-519745450
Cites: Med Educ. 2006 Sep;40(9):900-716925641
Cites: BMC Med Educ. 2008;8:2518430256
Cites: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Mar;14(1):79-9018038188
Cites: Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Feb 19;73(1):919513146
Cites: J Electrocardiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;42(4):339-4419268967
Cites: Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Jul 10;73(4):7019657503
Cites: BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:3416784524
PubMed ID
22248183 View in PubMed
Less detail