Skip header and navigation

1 records – page 1 of 1.

Integrating a theoretical framework with street outreach services: issues for successful training.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature213325
Source
Public Health Rep. 1996;111 Suppl 1:83-8
Publication Type
Article
Date
1996
Author
R. Cheney
A. Merwin
Author Affiliation
Philadelphia Health Management Corporation, PA 19102-5085, USA.
Source
Public Health Rep. 1996;111 Suppl 1:83-8
Date
1996
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - prevention & control
Allied Health Personnel - education
Community-Institutional Relations
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Program Development
Program Evaluation
Role Playing
Abstract
HIV/AIDS prevention projects utilizing indigenous outreach workers often rely on the life experiences and skills of the staff to structure the intervention, without grounding in theory. However, to be most effective, community outreach projects which target harder-to-reach high-risk populations should both utilize and enhance the natural strengths of indigenous field workers' experience and style of interaction, while guiding intervention content with theoretical rigor. In this paper we demonstrate that the challenge of successfully integrating a theoretically guided program design with field staff's credibility with, and sensitivity toward, drug-using clients can be practically and satisfactorily met through appropriate training. This training is an important investment for better utilizing valued and scarce prevention resources. The Philadelphia site of the AIDS Evaluation of Street Outreach Project (AESOP), a cooperative agreement of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, designed and implemented staff trainings to reflect the enhancement of the outreach program by the Stages of Change model. Through these trainings, the outreach workers have learned to integrate their natural street and intervention skills into the structure of a theoretical framework. This paper presents specific training components, relevant issues within these components, and areas for evaluation and feedback.
Notes
Cites: AIDS Educ Prev. 1989 Summer;1(2):105-182641228
Cites: Psychol Bull. 1992 May;111(3):455-741594721
Cites: Public Health Rep. 1996;111 Suppl 1:69-748862160
Cites: Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102-141329589
Cites: Prog Behav Modif. 1992;28:183-2181620663
PubMed ID
8862162 View in PubMed
Less detail