Skip header and navigation

Refine By

3 records – page 1 of 1.

Norway's ICT Accessibility Legislation, Methods and Indicators.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature291059
Source
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016; 229:471-81
Publication Type
Journal Article
Date
2016
Author
Malin Rygg
Dagfinn Rømen
Brynhild Runa Sterri
Author Affiliation
Norwegian Authority for Universal Design of ICT, Agency for Public Management and eGovernment (Difi), Norway.
Source
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016; 229:471-81
Date
2016
Language
English
Publication Type
Journal Article
Keywords
Access to Information - legislation & jurisprudence
Communication
Information Technology - legislation & jurisprudence
Norway
Abstract
This paper gives an overview of the Norwegian legislation on Universal Design of information and communication technology (ICT) and how the Norwegian Authority for Universal Design of ICT works to enforce and achieve the goals behind the legislation. The Authority uses indicators to check websites for compliance with the regulations. This paper describes the rationale and intended use for the indicators and how they are used for both supervision and benchmarks as well as a way of gathering data to give an overview of the current state of Universal Design of websites in Norway.
PubMed ID
27534342 View in PubMed
Less detail

Genomic Databases and Biobanks in Denmark.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature280292
Source
J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(4):743-53
Publication Type
Article
Date
2015
Author
Mette Hartlev
Source
J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(4):743-53
Date
2015
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Access to Information - legislation & jurisprudence
Biological Specimen Banks - legislation & jurisprudence
Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence
Databases, Genetic - legislation & jurisprudence
Denmark
Genetic Research - legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Abstract
Biobanking in Denmark is regulated via patients' rights laws, data protection laws, and research ethics reviews. Danish law recognizes tissue samples as personal data for purposes of the data protection laws, meaning research with tissue samples may be subject to research ethics review, data protection laws, and patients' rights requirements depending on the circumstances of collection. However, research on information gained through whole genome sequencing is subject only to data protection laws, despite the similarity in the nature of the information. The regulatory framework treats biobank samples collected from patients differently than samples collected from research participants, particularly with respect to autonomy. Importantly, biobanks established for future unspecified research are not subject to research ethics review. Biobank-based research has gained more prominence on the national level recently, and the potential for a less fragmented and more consistent regulatory approach may emerge from this attention.
PubMed ID
26711414 View in PubMed
Less detail

The confidentiality of patient and physician information in pharmacy prescription records.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature181323
Source
CMAJ. 2004 Mar 2;170(5):815-6
Publication Type
Article
Date
Mar-2-2004
Author
Dick E Zoutman
B Douglas Ford
Assil R Bassili
Author Affiliation
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada. zoutman@cliff.path.queensu.ca
Source
CMAJ. 2004 Mar 2;170(5):815-6
Date
Mar-2-2004
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Access to Information - legislation & jurisprudence
Canada
Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence
Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence
Drug Prescriptions
Humans
Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence
Medical Records Systems, Computerized - legislation & jurisprudence
Pharmacy
Physician-Patient Relations
Notes
Cites: JAMA. 2000 Jan 19;283(3):373-8010647801
Cites: J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Summer-Fall;25(2-3):98-110, 8211066504
Cites: CMAJ. 2000 Oct 31;163(9):1146-811079059
Cites: CMAJ. 2002 Aug 20;167(4):393-612197705
Cites: BMJ. 2003 Feb 15;326(7385):37312586673
Cites: CMAJ. 2003 Jul 8;169(1):5, 712847016
Cites: CMAJ. 1998 Oct 20;159(8):997-10169834730
Comment In: CMAJ. 2004 Sep 28;171(7):711-2; author reply 71215451823
PubMed ID
14993178 View in PubMed
Less detail