In the original version of this Article, the third sentence of the first paragraph of the "Changes in the input of polar waters into the Labrador Sea" section of the Results originally incorrectly read 'During the spring-summer months, after the winter convection has ceased in the Labrador Sea, its northwest boundary currents (the EGC and IC) support restratification of the surface ocean through lateral transport.' The correct version states 'northeast' instead of 'northwest'. The fifth sentence of the second paragraph of the same section originally incorrectly read "In contrast, in the western section of the Nordic Seas, under the presence of warm Atlantic waters of the Norwegian Current, Nps was found to calcify deeper in the water column (100-200 m), whereas in the east under the influence of the EGC polar waters it calcified closer to the surface at a similar depth as Tq23." The correct version states 'eastern' instead of 'western' and 'west' instead of 'east'.The seventh sentence of the same paragraph originally incorrectly read "Small/large differences in ?d18ONps-Tq indicating increased/decreased presence of warm and salty Atlantic IC waters vs. polar EGC waters in the upper water column, respectively." The correct version starts 'Large/small' rather than 'Small/large'.These errors have been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Notes
ErratumFor: Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 23;8(1):1726 PMID 29167464
The original version of this Article contained an error in the author affiliations. Affiliation 5 incorrectly read 'Tyumen State Oil and Gas University, Tyumen, Tyument. Oblast, Russian Federation, 625000'.This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Notes
ErratumFor: Nat Commun. 2018 Dec 21;9(1):5423 PMID 30575717
Centers for American indian and Alaska Native Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, USA. chad.danyluck@ucdenver.edu.
The authors became aware of a mistake in the data displayed in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2 of the original version of the Article. Specifically, the 14C production values were printed out in the code before the conversion between the omnidirectional fluence and the flux. As a consequence, the values of the 14C production in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2 were too high by a factor of 4×p?=?12.566.. As a result of this, a number of changes have been made to both the PDF and the HTML versions of the Article. A full list of these changes is available online.
Notes
ErratumFor: Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 28;9(1):3495 PMID 30154404
